I'm a little confused as to what the difference would be in using each of these NAT options in the following scenario:
Say inside host 10.10.10.10 needed to be translated to an ip of 172.16.10.10 when the destination address is 192.168.10.10.
I should be able to accomplish this with either of the following:
policy dynamic NAT:
access-list policy_nat permit ip host 10.10.10.10 host 192.168.10.10
nat (inside) 1 access-list policy_nat
global (outside) 1 172.16.10.10
static policy NAT
access-list static_nat permit ip host 10.10.10.10 host 192.168.10.10
static (inside,outside) 172.16.10.10 access-list static_nat
If both of those NAT options translate the source ip address based on a conditional destination address, what is the difference between the two?