cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
668
Views
4
Helpful
3
Replies

Route missing

vishwancc
Level 3
Level 3

Hi ALL:

It sounds crazy but its happening,while configuring the RP for 6500 i have put some static route , but i dont see them in the routing table,this is new switch and not connected to network , any idea why ?

***********************

interface Vlan62

ip address x.x.62.1 255.255.255.0

no ip redirects

arp timeout 60

standby 62 ip x.x.62.254

standby 62 priority 120

standby 62 preempt delay minimum 2

!

interface Vlan67

ip address x.x.67.1 255.255.255.0

no ip redirects

arp timeout 60

standby 64 ip x.x.64.254

standby 64 priority 120

!

ip classless

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Vlan62

ip route x.x.x.0 255.255.255.240 x.x.64.25

ip route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 x.x.64.25

ip route 172.22.0.0 255.255.0.0 x.x.64.25

i

no ip http server

!

!

!

!

end

Router#show ip route

Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP

D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area

N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2

E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP

i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter area

* - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR

P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 0.0.0.0

X.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets

C x.x.67.0 is directly connected, Vlan67

C x.x.62.0 is directly connected, Vlan62

S* 0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, Vlan62

******************

Chao

Vishwa

3 Replies 3

ajagadee
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Vishwa,

I see couple of things in your configuration and I hope that will clear your route missing issue.

1. SVI VLAN 67

interface Vlan67

ip address x.x.67.1 255.255.255.0

no ip redirects

arp timeout 60

standby 64 ip x.x.64.254

standby 64 priority 120

You have configured an address of x.x.67.1/24 on the SVI VLAN 67 but the HSRP Standby address is x.x.64.254/24. The third octet is not the same.

2. Also, your static routes that are not showing up in the routing table, that is

ip route x.x.x.0 255.255.255.240 x.x.64.25

ip route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 x.x.64.25

ip route 172.22.0.0 255.255.0.0 x.x.64.25

are all pointing to a 64.25 address. Is this the correct configuration or did you mean to configure a SVI VLAN 64 and put the x.x.64.x addresses in there.

Regards,

Arul

*Pls rate if it helps*

Richard Burts
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Vishwa

There is a simple explanation for this. You have configured static routes with this next hop address: x.x.64.25 but there is not anything in the routing table that tells where x.x.64.25 is (and not anything that tells through which interface to go to get to that address). If the next hop address for a static route is not reachable then the static route is not put into the routing table.

HTH

Rick

HTH

Rick

Hi Rick,

I see what you are saying.

This switch have a default router to my router interface which have route to x.x.64.25,so i think unit i connect it to the network static route will not come.

Thanks again its people like you who make life simple:-)

Chao

Vishwa

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card