12-18-2008 09:40 AM - edited 03-04-2019 12:45 AM
I am trying to redistribute a RIP route to an EIGRP process to no avail. Below are the commands:
router eigrp 65204
redistribute rip metric 1000000 10 255 1 1500 route-map rip-to-eigrp
network 10.33.94.120 0.0.0.3
network 10.33.94.128 0.0.0.3
no auto-summary
router rip
version 2
passive-interface Vlan10
passive-interface Vlan11
network 10.0.0.0
distribute-list prefix HK in Vlan10
no auto-summary
access-list 50 permit 10.170.0.254
route-map rip-to-eigrp permit 10
match ip route-source 50
HK02#sh ip route rip
198.140.33.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R 198.140.33.2 [120/1] via 10.170.0.254, 00:00:10, Vlan10
HK02#sh ip eigrp topo 198.140.33.2
% IP-EIGRP (AS 65204): Route not in topology table
12-18-2008 09:57 AM
Hello Etienne,
what if you use match ip next-hop 50 instead inside the route-map ?
or even if you try to match directly the prefix 198.140.33.2/32
2)
you have passive-interface vlan10 so you are trying to learn a prefix without providing routes to your RIP neighbor
Hope to help
Giuseppe
12-18-2008 10:02 AM
Hi Giuseppe,
Thanks for the quick reply. What I am trying to do is redistribute the learned RIP address to my internal EIGRP. The device is learing the RIP information just fine but it cannot redistribute it into EIGRP.
12-18-2008 10:07 AM
Hello Etienne,
I wonder if RIP has the concept or route-source or it is missing it.
for example an OSPF LSA has a clear route-source the OSPF RID of the router that generated it.
With RIP data structures are changed at every hop and so I think it is more appropriate to match on the ip next hop that appears as via x.x.x.x instead of looking for a route-source
The practical effect should be the same
Hope to help
Giuseppe
12-18-2008 10:32 AM
Hi Giuseppe,
yes, it seems to have that capability:
HK02(config-route-map)#match ip ?
address Match address of route or match packet
next-hop Match next-hop address of route
route-source Match advertising source address of route
12-18-2008 11:02 AM
Well it is not showing in the topology table:
HK02#sh ip eigrp topo 198.140.33.2
% IP-EIGRP (AS 65204): Route not in topology table
but it shows up when i do show ip route 198.10.33.2 from another router.
HK00#sh ip route 198.140.33.2
Routing entry for 198.140.33.2/32
Known via "eigrp 65204", distance 170, metric 5376
Tag 12, type external
Redistributing via eigrp 65204
Last update from 10.33.94.121 on GigabitEthernet0/1, 00:08:26 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.33.94.121, from 10.33.94.121, 00:08:26 ago, via GigabitEthernet0/1
Route metric is 5376, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 110 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 1000000 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1
Route tag 12
So, it is being distributed via into eigrp.
12-18-2008 10:38 AM
I also tried to use "next hop" to no avail either.
12-18-2008 11:02 AM
I do not believe that there is a problem with your route map and believe that the route is probably being redistributed. The problem is with how you are looking for it. I set up a lab to duplicate your issue. When I issue the command sh ip eigrp topo 198.140.33.2 I get the same result of route not in table. But when I add the mask to the request sh ip eigrp topo 198.140.33.2 255.255.255.255 then I see that the route is in the table.
I suggest that you retry the show ip eigrp topology command and specify the mask.
HTH
Rick
12-18-2008 11:05 AM
Hi rburst,
It looks like we posted at the same time. Yes, it shows up when you had the subnet.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide