I have a network ( Diagram attached)
In this there are two Route reflectors.
Four Edge routers - connecting ISP.Route reflectors are confiured for redundancy.
Route Relector R1,and repective clients are in DC.
Route Reflector R2 and Respective Clients are in DR.
Clent routers will initiate Crypto tunnels to edge routers and reserse route injection will help the serverfarm to reach the clients.
Now For redundance any route comming to RR2 has to go to RR1 and DC network as well.
Here RR1 and RR2 are suppose to be configured as Route reflector Clients again for themselfs( Am i making the point ???)
This leads to lot of confusion - even though the network is workig fine as of now ( no link failures happend yet) im afraid there would be issues in prefix announcement.
Some of the issues :
1.There are Rib- failures
2.There are Prefixes which are not be advertised by clients for some reasons.
3.RRs are having unequal number of prefixes.
Please suggest will this be fine or any alternative for this?
I may be wrong you know much more details about your scenario.
I thought the tunnel can be routed via the ISP links using the eBGP knoweldge of DC and DR IP subnets (including RRS loopbacks).
You mean the tunnel is going via the OSPF cloud.
If so it has a different duty and may be quite useful.
However, there is a risk to advertise all subnets via DC and via DR sites.
Thanks for your kind marks.
Hope to help