01-14-2009 11:17 PM - last edited on 03-25-2019 05:41 PM by ciscomoderator
I will have to implement a change which involves switching a single mode FWSM to multi mode.
Currently i have everything configured based on NAT0/NAT exemption which is going to be converted into static statements when doing the mode multi switch.
The only thing i am currently not sure about is if i need a static for same security level interfaces. Yes i know you only do statics from high to low interfaces but i just wanted to make sure that i don't have to prepare 4 pages of static rules before initiating the change.
Same security interfaces - static necessary? Please say NO. :)
Thanks for reading
Roble
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-15-2009 04:30 AM
Roble
"Please say NO. :)"
Okay then, no you don't need statics :-). See attached link for confirmation -
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/fwsm/fwsm32/configuration/guide/cfgnat_f.html#wp1042673
Jon
01-15-2009 04:30 AM
Roble
"Please say NO. :)"
Okay then, no you don't need statics :-). See attached link for confirmation -
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/fwsm/fwsm32/configuration/guide/cfgnat_f.html#wp1042673
Jon
01-15-2009 06:14 AM
Hi Jon,
that was exactly what i was looking for. Thanks for pointing that out.
Roble
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide