01-25-2009 04:33 PM - edited 03-06-2019 03:38 AM
Hi every body!
I was reading about redundancy in switch supervisors.
There are different modes:
1) route processor redundancy(RPR)
2)Route processor redundancy(RPR+)
3)stateful switchover (SSO)
q1)I understand how these modes but my question is why one want to use any other mode but sso as fail over time is less than a second compared to other modes ?
q2) Should both supervisors be same?
Thanks a lot!
01-26-2009 12:44 AM
Hello Sarah,
q1) SSO requires identical supervisors, identical ios image and newer IOS image (it has more tight requirements) so there can be cases where RPR or RPR+ can be used but SSO cannot
q2) for SSO they need to be exactly the same model, RPR and RPR+ have lesser requirements
see
Hope to help
Giuseppe
01-26-2009 09:11 PM
thanks a lot Giuseppe!
My book says
For RPR+ ios must be of same release. How about sup? they should be same as well?
01-26-2009 09:22 PM
The sups' have to be the same as well.
regards,
-amit singh
01-26-2009 01:19 AM
Hi ,
There are several modes , but every mode has its own unique circumstances. The fastest mode is not always the best mode
1)SSO enables subsecond convergence , but some state tables like HSRP encounters problems during the switchover. For example if your supervisors or RPs switch faster than your HSRP timeout , you will definetely experience a switchover in the HSRP state as well.
2) The Supervisors / RPs must be the same.
HTH
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: