02-05-2009 11:26 AM
I have a 2621XM device, when I generate the detailed device report, under Module Information, I get the following info, when I look at Ciscoview I can see two 10/100 ports, fa0/0 and fa0/1, why are does this report show Number of Ports as ZERO:
Module Index 3
Parent Index 2
Parent Type container
Slot Number 0
Description C2600 Mainboard
Serial Number
Vendor Type cevModuleUnknownCard
Model Name
Physical Entity Name
Slot Configuration
Manufacturer Name
Operational Status
HW Version
SW Version
FW Version
Number of Slots
Number of Ports 0
Multiservice false
Inline Power Capable false
Hardware Encryption
Module IP Address
Additional Status
Admin Status
Reset Reason
Unique Device Identifier PID : C2600 Mainboard VID : SN
Solved! Go to Solution.
02-09-2009 10:48 AM
Yes, there is a problem here. The ports should be contained by entPhysicalIndex.3 not .1. This is bug CSCeg01295 which is fixed in 12.4.
02-07-2009 03:54 PM
This could be an ENTITY-MIB bug. I have a 2651XM, and it is showing the number of ports per module (as well as the mainboard) correctly. What version of code is running on this device? What version of RME? What versions of the Rtr2600XM and SharedInventoryRouter RME packages do you have loaded?
02-09-2009 05:01 AM
Code Version on Device: Version 12.1(17)
RME Version: 4.0.6
Rtr2600XM Version:1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.469 Cisco 2621 Multiservice Platform Rtr2600XM 1.1
I'm not seeing SharedInventoryRouter package, I looked in the Device Map and i only see packages for SharedInventoryFastSwitch, SharedInventoryCat3900, SharedInventoryCat3900, SharedInventoryCallManager.
02-09-2009 10:22 AM
This could be an ENTITY-MIB problem. My 2651 is running 12.4. You must have a SharedInventoryRouter package, or things wouldn't be working very well at all.
Please post an SNMP walk of the entPhysicalTable (1.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1).
02-09-2009 10:36 AM
Sorry, here is the SharedInventoryRouter package info:
SharedInventoryRouter 1.5.1 SharedInventoryRouter device package
-------------------------------------
The following is a SNMP walk of device xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx starting from .1.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1
SNMP Walk Output:
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalDescr.1 = STRING: 2621XM chassis, Hw Serial#: 3842832241, Hw Revision: 0x100
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalDescr.2 = STRING: 2600 Chassis Slot
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalDescr.3 = STRING: C2600 Mainboard
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalDescr.4 = STRING: 2600 DaughterCard Slot
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalDescr.5 = STRING: 2600 DaughterCard Slot
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalDescr.6 = STRING: 2600 Chassis Slot
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalDescr.7 = STRING: AmdFE
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalDescr.8 = STRING: AmdFE
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalVendorType.1 = OID: CISCO-ENTITY-VENDORTYPE-OID-MIB::cevChassis2621XM
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalVendorType.2 = OID: CISCO-ENTITY-VENDORTYPE-OID-MIB::cevContainerSlot
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalVendorType.3 = OID: CISCO-ENTITY-VENDORTYPE-OID-MIB::cevModuleUnknownCard
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalVendorType.4 = OID: CISCO-ENTITY-VENDORTYPE-OID-MIB::cevContainerDaughterCard
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalVendorType.5 = OID: CISCO-ENTITY-VENDORTYPE-OID-MIB::cevContainerDaughterCard
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalVendorType.6 = OID: CISCO-ENTITY-VENDORTYPE-OID-MIB::cevContainerSlot
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalVendorType.7 = OID: CISCO-ENTITY-VENDORTYPE-OID-MIB::cevPortFEIP
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalVendorType.8 = OID: CISCO-ENTITY-VENDORTYPE-OID-MIB::cevPortFEIP
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalContainedIn.1 = INTEGER: 0
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalContainedIn.2 = INTEGER: 1
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalContainedIn.3 = INTEGER: 2
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalContainedIn.4 = INTEGER: 3
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalContainedIn.5 = INTEGER: 3
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalContainedIn.6 = INTEGER: 1
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalContainedIn.7 = INTEGER: 1
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalContainedIn.8 = INTEGER: 1
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalClass.1 = INTEGER: chassis(3)
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalClass.2 = INTEGER: container(5)
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalClass.3 = INTEGER: module(9)
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalClass.4 = INTEGER: container(5)
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalClass.5 = INTEGER: container(5)
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalClass.6 = INTEGER: container(5)
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalClass.7 = INTEGER: port(10)
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalClass.8 = INTEGER: port(10)
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalParentRelPos.1 = INTEGER: -1
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalParentRelPos.2 = INTEGER: 0
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalParentRelPos.3 = INTEGER: 0
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalParentRelPos.4 = INTEGER: 0
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalParentRelPos.5 = INTEGER: 1
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalParentRelPos.6 = INTEGER: 1
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalParentRelPos.7 = INTEGER: 0
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalParentRelPos.8 = INTEGER: 1
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalName.1 = STRING:
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalName.2 = STRING:
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalName.3 = STRING:
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalName.4 = STRING:
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalName.5 = STRING:
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalName.6 = STRING:
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalName.7 = STRING: FastEthernet0/0
ENTITY-MIB::entPhysicalName.8 = STRING: FastEthernet0/1
02-09-2009 10:48 AM
Yes, there is a problem here. The ports should be contained by entPhysicalIndex.3 not .1. This is bug CSCeg01295 which is fixed in 12.4.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide