Routing error

Unanswered Question
Feb 7th, 2009
User Badges:

Hello friends ,

I connect two LANs together with two Cisco 2600 with PARADYNE 7975 M/SDSL.

I can telnet each of them trough another router.

But computers that each side can't ping another side.

LAN1 IP address is : 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0

LAN2 IP address is : 172.17.0.0 255.255.0.0


---------- Router1 -------------------


interface FastEthernet0/0

ip address 172.20.2.3 255.255.0.0

duplex auto

speed auto


interface Serial0/1

ip address 172.18.2.5 255.255.255.0

encapsulation ppp


ip classless

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 FastEthernet0/0

ip route 172.17.0.0 255.255.0.0 Serial0/1

ip route 172.18.0.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0/1

ip route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 FastEthernet0/0

no ip pim bidir-enable



---------- Router2 -------------------


interface FastEthernet0/0

ip address 172.17.2.1 255.255.0.0

duplex auto

speed auto


interface Serial0/1

ip address 172.18.2.6 255.255.255.0

encapsulation ppp


ip classless

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/1

ip route 172.17.0.0 255.255.0.0 FastEthernet0/0

ip route 172.18.0.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0/1

ip route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 Serial0/1


Thanks for your helping.


  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
ohassairi Sun, 02/08/2009 - 01:47
User Badges:
  • Silver, 250 points or more

remove these routes they are not necessary:

from router1

ip route 172.18.0.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0/1

ip route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 FastEthernet0/0


from router2

ip route 172.17.0.0 255.255.0.0 FastEthernet0/0

ip route 172.18.0.0 255.255.255.0 Serial0/1

ip route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 Serial0/1


make sure you don't have "no ip routing" in the config file.


can you display the output of : show ip interfaces brief


Reza Rezazadeh Sun, 02/08/2009 - 03:19
User Badges:

Hello ohass,

Thank for your help ,

"ip route 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 Serial0/1 ", from router2 is necessary. right ?


here is output of :show ip interfaces brief


Router1

Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol

FastEthernet0/0 172.20.2.3 YES NVRAM up up


Serial0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down


Serial0/1 172.18.2.5 YES manual up up


Router2


Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol

FastEthernet0/0 172.17.2.1 YES manual up up


Serial0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down


FastEthernet0/1 unassigned YES NVRAM administratively down down


Serial0/1 172.18.2.6 YES manual up up


Thanks for helping

Nicholas Matthews Sun, 02/08/2009 - 13:04
User Badges:
  • Red, 2250 points or more

You really should avoid using interfaces as the destinations of routes, unless you are also including an IP address.


This causes the router to ARP for the next address every time it sends a packet out that interface.


Try replacing the routing statements with IP addresses instead of interfaces, and see if it helps your problem.



hth,

nick

ohassairi Mon, 02/09/2009 - 20:59
User Badges:
  • Silver, 250 points or more

yes it is necessary but since you have a default route (0.0.0.0) this will replace the static route. any way: any one will be enough.

now:

1-from rtr1 (console) try to ping wan of rtr2.

2-plz disp;ay the output of show ip route

Actions

This Discussion