02-20-2009 12:36 PM - edited 03-04-2019 03:40 AM
I put the next class map and traffic shapping.
At a time i have ping of 1200 ms and i can see in an application of monitoring the consumption of bandwidth does not come to 50k.
When applied the command "not class voice_256kb" in the interface Serial1/1.3, the ping low to 20 ms.
Do i have something wrong with the configuration?
policy-map 256K
class T
priority 100
compress header ip rtp
class S
bandwidth 32
class e
bandwidth 60
class class-default
fair-queue
random-detect
map-class frame-relay voice_256kb
frame-relay cir 243200
frame-relay bc 2432
frame-relay be 0
frame-relay mincir 243200
service-policy output 256K
frame-relay fragment 320
interface Serial 1/1
bandwidth 2048
no ip address
no ip redirects
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
no ip mroute-cache
load-interval 30
serial restart-delay 0
no clns route-cache
frame-relay traffic-shaping
frame-relay lmi-type ansi
interface Serial1/1.3 point-to-point
bandwidth 256
ip address 1.2.2.1 255.255.255.252
ip summary-address eigrp 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 5
frame-relay interface-dlci 3
class voice_256kb
02-20-2009 01:51 PM
I am thinking that provider don't change all configuration, and i have 64k yet
How do I know if the supplier change the speed of link to 256k?
02-20-2009 07:37 PM
I try to explain mi problem better:
The link of frame relay was to 64k and was expanded to 256k, but i
think that the supplier has not done the enlargement.
At some times when i make a ping, it reaches 1200 ms, and when remove
the policy of the inerface Serial1/1.3, the ping reaches 25 ms.
If the link is even at 64, and increase the fragmentation to 320,
could this be causing the behavior that i have in the link?
Is there something wrong with the configuration that i am doing?
Or, Do the supplier has not done the increase of bandwidth?
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: