2610 has no route for directly connected?

Unanswered Question
Apr 1st, 2009
User Badges:
  • Bronze, 100 points or more

Well I've powered up my 2610 (Router Z) and connected it via Ethernet crossover to one of my old 2501's (Router A). The addresses are 10.3.3.1/24 (A) and 10.3.3.26(Z). Router Z has CDP neighborship with Router A and Router A responds to a broadcast ping from Z. But when I try telnet or a unicast ping from Z to 10.3.3.1, nothing happens. (Making Eth0/0 the gateway of last resort at least fixes that, but I don't think I should have to resort to that just to get to a directly connected subnet.)


System image file is "flash:c2600-i-mz.120-3.T3"


Is what I'm seeing normal behavior? 2600's won't automatically have a route for directly connecteds?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
Jon Marshall Wed, 04/01/2009 - 15:55
User Badges:
  • Super Blue, 32500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, WAN

Seth


No, all routers should have entries for directly connected routes.


Are your subnet masks consistent. Have you tried an extended ping from Z with source IP in 10.3.3.x network - yes i know it should work anyway.


Jon

CriscoSystems Wed, 04/01/2009 - 19:30
User Badges:
  • Bronze, 100 points or more

Well that was weird. I rebooted the 2610 and now everything's fine - I can unicast ping; and 10.3.3.0/24 shows up in the table.


Hooray for reboots...


Actions

This Discussion