Re: 6500 MSFC3/PFC3 and service-policy output command ...

Answered Question
Apr 5th, 2009
User Badges:

Hi,

I have a 6500 box with MSFC3/PFC3 and have upgraded the IOS version to s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF11.bin. It was running IOS verison before this : s72033-pk9sv-mz.122-17d.SXB11.bin

It does note seem to accept the service-policy output command after the upgrade.


routerA(config)#int gi2/47

routerA(config-if)#service-policy output A-Voice

bandwidth percent command is not supported in output direction for this interface

Configuration failed on: GigabitEthernet2/47


routerA(config-if)#service-policy output A-Voice-100M

bandwidth command is not supported in output direction for this interface

Configuration failed on: GigabitEthernet2/47


Is MQC with the bandwidth or bandwidth percent command not supported on the 6500 series box ?

Pls advice,


Cheers,

- InternetB -

Correct Answer by Edison Ortiz about 8 years 3 months ago

Is MQC with the bandwidth or bandwidth percent command not supported on the 6500 series box ?


It's not supported when using regular line cards along with the PFC QoS.


If you purchase a SIP/SPA module, then you can use your regular MQC commands.


Please refer to the documentation:


http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SXF/native/configuration/guide/qos.html#wp1465326


HTH,


__


Edison.



  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
Loading.
Correct Answer
Edison Ortiz Mon, 04/06/2009 - 06:13
User Badges:
  • Super Bronze, 10000 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

Is MQC with the bandwidth or bandwidth percent command not supported on the 6500 series box ?


It's not supported when using regular line cards along with the PFC QoS.


If you purchase a SIP/SPA module, then you can use your regular MQC commands.


Please refer to the documentation:


http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SXF/native/configuration/guide/qos.html#wp1465326


HTH,


__


Edison.



Actions

This Discussion