Unified Failover/Standby Redundancy confused????

Unanswered Question

We have Unified 4.21 (might upgrade to 7.0 later this year) with exchange 2003 (external).


We have failover design (active/passive) now. In the very near future, we will have DR site.


I think my question is that:


Can Failover and standby Redundancy co-exist?? In other words, two servers with failover at Main Data Center, and 1 server with Standby Redundancy at DR Site.


Anyone done that before??


Thanks


Ken

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
htluo Wed, 04/08/2009 - 10:01
User Badges:
  • Red, 2250 points or more

Maybe you meant "Unity" instead of "Unified"? If that's the case, please change the title. So people won't get confused.


Michael

http://htluo.blogspot.com

Vance Krier Thu, 04/09/2009 - 08:15
User Badges:

I think the answer to your question is basically no. You can only setup failover between two Unity hosts. There are no three way replication methods.


I just ran into the same situation where we already have a hot standby failover but wanted to add another DR Unity box.


Basically, our 'DR' plan is to restore the latest DiRT backup in the event of a catasrophic failure.


Hope this helps.


Vance


Actions

This Discussion