04-22-2009 10:48 PM
OK IronPort nation... need some help defending the empire here... Has anyone had any real expierience with the Microsoft Edge server? I need some real reasons to not migrate off of IronPort and onto the Microsoft Edge server... The Exchange administrators are after me... HELP!!!!
05-12-2009 06:50 PM
OK IronPort nation... need some help defending the empire here... Has anyone had any real expierience with the Microsoft Edge server? I need some real reasons to not migrate off of IronPort and onto the Microsoft Edge server... The Exchange administrators are after me... HELP!!!!
05-12-2009 10:58 PM
I am also one of the Exchange Admins so I am justifying the cost of the IronPort appliances over the Edge Role that we all ready own but haven't deployed.
Thanks for the input.
Long live the NATION.
05-18-2009 02:19 PM
I am also one of the Exchange Admins so I am justifying the cost of the IronPort appliances over the Edge Role that we all ready own but haven't deployed.
Thanks for the input.
Long live the NATION.
The antispam features in Exchange 2007 won't have anyone at antivirus market leader Symantec too frightened, out of the gate. Using the same antispam testing methodology we used in our 2004 antispam test over an 11,000-message stream, we found the spam-catch rate of the Exchange 2007 engine was a dismally low 81% to 86%, while the false-positive rate was an unacceptably high 2.1% to 2.3%. Results for Symantec and IronPort gave spam-catch rates of over 94%, with false-positive rates of less than .5% (see graphic). Users migrating to Exchange 2007 may want to keep their existing antispam and antivirus gateways.
05-20-2009 05:11 PM
Thanks Bob, this is what I needed. An independant voice showing real world results with different solutions.
Long live the NATION!.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide