IP route

Unanswered Question
May 5th, 2009
User Badges:

Hi all,

I have a router with the following configuration: ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/1/0:1 172.16.200.153

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/0/0:1 172.16.200.157


show ip route

<Output Omitted>

Gateway of last resort is 172.16.200.157 to network 0.0.0.0


show ip route static

S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 172.16.200.157, Serial0/0/0:1

[1/0] via 172.16.200.153, Serial0/1/0:1

Because I have two default routes does that mean the router is using both for internet traffic even though the gateway of last resort is just one?

Thanks in advance

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (5 ratings)
Loading.
Giuseppe Larosa Tue, 05/05/2009 - 05:41
User Badges:
  • Super Silver, 17500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

Hello Hipolito,

yes both default routes are used you can see this on the sh ip route


show ip route static

S* 0.0.0.0/0 [1/0] via 172.16.200.157, Serial0/0/0:1

[1/0] via 172.16.200.153, Serial0/1/0:1


both are listed so both are installed and used.


Hope to help

Giuseppe


John Blakley Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:11
User Badges:
  • Purple, 4500 points or more

Giuseppe,


Would this type situation be a load balanced scenario or failover?


Thanks,

John

lamav Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:14
User Badges:
  • Blue, 1500 points or more

John, both routes will be active in the routing table, so they would both be utilized. The manner in which you share the traffic load across the two links would depend on what kind of load balancing you are using.


HTH


Victor



John Blakley Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:16
User Badges:
  • Purple, 4500 points or more

Victor,


The manner in which you share the traffic load across the two links would depend on what kind of load balancing you are using.


As in glbp, or more like the type of routing protocol you're using like bgp?


Thanks!

John

Jon Marshall Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:22
User Badges:
  • Super Blue, 32500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, WAN

John


As in per packet or per destination load balancing.


Jon

lamav Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:25
User Badges:
  • Blue, 1500 points or more

HEY HEY HEY!!!! >:-(


Don't you be steppin' in my space...Mr. Man!!!


:-)



Jon Marshall Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:26
User Badges:
  • Super Blue, 32500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, WAN

Sorry Victor couldn't resist :-)


Besides, since when has your name been Giuseppe as in


"Giuseppe,


Would this type situation be a load balanced scenario or failover?"


Jon

lamav Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:23
User Badges:
  • Blue, 1500 points or more

The routing protocol will discover 2 equal cost paths and place them both in the routing table (forget about EIGRP variance for now).


What I was referring to is wether you have per-packet- or per-destination-based load sharing configured.


With per-packet load balancing, each path is utilized alternately on a packet by packet basis. This utilizes both links pretty evenly, but you may get an issue with a disparity in delay and packets being received at the distant end out of order.


With per-destination, it is as the name suggests; each source-destination flow will be examined and one path selected based on that.


HTH


Victor

John Blakley Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:25
User Badges:
  • Purple, 4500 points or more

hmmmm....do you have a link to describe how to configure per-destination load sharing?

Jon Marshall Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:27
User Badges:
  • Super Blue, 32500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, WAN

John


I could tell you but then Victor will have a go at me so i can't i'm afraid :-)


Jon

lamav Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:28
User Badges:
  • Blue, 1500 points or more

That's more like it...damn it. ;-)

lamav Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:33
User Badges:
  • Blue, 1500 points or more

John:


You're welcome.



Jon:


I rated the post in which you show that you have finally come to your senses and realized that I am someone you should be afraid of!


LOLOL


Victor

Jon Marshall Tue, 05/05/2009 - 09:34
User Badges:
  • Super Blue, 32500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, WAN

Typical


I spend half the day providing some of my best technical advice to multiple posters and the only rating i get is for this !!


I am afraid Victor, very afraid....



Jon Marshall Tue, 05/05/2009 - 14:27
User Badges:
  • Super Blue, 32500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, WAN

John


Indeed you do and it is much appreciated. My comments were really directed at Victor as i hope you realise. NO offense intended.


Victor - see what problems you cause :-)


Jon

Actions

This Discussion