AIR-WLC4402-25-K9 and AIR-WLC2125-K9

Answered Question
May 12th, 2009
User Badges:

Hello,

I have 20 LAP 1131G to deploy with a wireless contrôller and i have to choose between the AIR-WLC4402-25-K9 and AIR-WLC2125-K9. I would like to khnow the main différance between this products espacially in term of performance (Throughput).

Thank you in advance

Houichi Nizar

Correct Answer by Rob Huffman about 8 years 2 months ago

Hi Houichi,


From the Cisco docs;


“While Cisco 2100 Series Wireless LAN Controllers support transaction-oriented wireless environments such as handheld scanners in retail, the Cisco 4400 Series Wireless LAN Controllers are recommended for high-data-rate and multicast-intensive applications such as large data files, video, push-to-talk.”


Cisco 2100 Series Wireless LAN Controllers



http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps6302/ps8322/ps7206/ps7221/product_data_sheet0900aecd805aaab9.html



Hope this helps!

Rob

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
Loading.
Correct Answer
Rob Huffman Tue, 05/12/2009 - 15:08
User Badges:
  • Super Blue, 32500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 IP Telephony, Unified Communications

Hi Houichi,


From the Cisco docs;


“While Cisco 2100 Series Wireless LAN Controllers support transaction-oriented wireless environments such as handheld scanners in retail, the Cisco 4400 Series Wireless LAN Controllers are recommended for high-data-rate and multicast-intensive applications such as large data files, video, push-to-talk.”


Cisco 2100 Series Wireless LAN Controllers



http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps6302/ps8322/ps7206/ps7221/product_data_sheet0900aecd805aaab9.html



Hope this helps!

Rob

Leo Laohoo Tue, 05/12/2009 - 15:14
User Badges:
  • Super Gold, 25000 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    The Hall of Fame designation is a lifetime achievement award based on significant overall achievements in the community. 

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, Wireless

Hi Houichi,

In addition to Rob's post, the 4400 are rack-mountable while the 2100 are not. There are other things a 2100 can't do, such as LAGs. One of the benefits of using the 2100 is when space is a premium and 2100 uses RJ45 as links. 4400 uses SFP.


In my humble opinion, you should consider using a 4400-50 just in case there's an option for you to grow.

dennischolmes Thu, 05/14/2009 - 10:00
User Badges:
  • Gold, 750 points or more

The basic differences are these:

2100 has lower powered processor.

2100 only has 100base-t ports 4400 gig

2100 has ext. power brick, 4400 internal

4400 can be used easily as mobility anch.

basic rule of thumb to follow is more than 15 users go with a 4400.

Actions

This Discussion