Monitoring ACE Ressource Usage with MRTG

Unanswered Question
May 15th, 2009
User Badges:

Dear all,

we would like to monitor several ressource usages on our ACE module,

but didn't have much luck so far. In particular we want to have MRTG graphs for :


* CPU usage

In MRTG we tried "Target[lb-admin-cpu]: 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.7&1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.8:[email protected]-admin", but it does not graph anything. Are the OIDs not correct ?


* Memory Usage

How is this possible ? Which OID do we have to use ?


* Serverfarm Usage

We would like to monitor the number of connections for each serverfarm and for each rserver. How is this possible ? Which OIDs do we have to use ?


Thank you in advance for your help.


  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
Gilles Dufour Fri, 05/15/2009 - 06:15
User Badges:
  • Cisco Employee,

Be aware that ACE has multiple CPU.

The OID is for the management CPU (config, probe,...) but not the CPU that actually switches the traffic.


CISCO-PROCESS-MIB::cpmCPUTotalPhysicalIndex.1 = INTEGER: 1

CISCO-PROCESS-MIB::cpmCPUTotal1minRev.1 = Gauge32: 17 percent

CISCO-PROCESS-MIB::cpmCPUTotal5minRev.1 = Gauge32: 16 percent

CISCO-PROCESS-MIB::cpmCPUMonInterval.1 = Gauge32: 5 seconds



CISCO-SLB-EXT-MIB::cslbxStatsCurrConnections.3 = Gauge32: 6 connections

CISCO-SLB-EXT-MIB::cslbxStatsFailedConns.3 = Counter32: 0 connections

CISCO-SLB-EXT-MIB::cslbxStatsL4PolicyConns.3 = Counter32: 0 connections

CISCO-SLB-EXT-MIB::cslbxStatsL7PolicyConns.3 = Counter32: 0 connections





cesServerFarmRserverTable - 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.470.1.1.3


http://tools.cisco.com/Support/SNMP/do/BrowseOID.do?objectInput=cesServerFarmRserverTable&translate=Translate&submitValue=SUBMIT



Fresenius-Netcare Tue, 05/26/2009 - 06:13
User Badges:

Hi,

thank you for the reply.

So one can not get the usage of other CPU using SNMP ?

What about memory usage ?

From your answer I understand that we can only monitor the total amount of connections (cslbxStatsCurrConnections) in a context, but it is not possible to monitor the connections per realserver or per serverfarm. Is that correct ?


Actions

This Discussion