Dial Peer issue

Answered Question
May 18th, 2009

hello,

I have an issue with dial-peers, when i call one of my did's i get dial tone, the last 4 digits of the did are 8084

dial-peer voice 17 voip

preference 1

destination-pattern [1-8]...

session target ipv4:<ccm-ip>

dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric

dial-peer voice 18 voip

preference 2

destination-pattern [1-8]...

session target ipv4:<ccm-ip>

dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric

dial-peer voice 1 pots

incoming called-number .

port 0/1/0:23

dial-peer voice 2 pots

destination-pattern 9T

port 0/1/0:23

dial-peer voice 9011 pots

destination-pattern 9011T

port 0/1/0:23

dial-peer voice 11 voip

destination-pattern 8480

session target ipv4:<ccm-ip>

dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric

what's wrong?

thanks

Correct Answer by Paolo Bevilacqua about 7 years 9 months ago

Configure:

dial-peer voice 1

direct-inward-dial

Incidentally, you do not need to specify port for DP 1.

Correct Answer by Brandon Buffin about 7 years 9 months ago

Add the command "direct-inward-dial" to dial peers 1 and 2.

Hope this helps.

Brandon

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (2 ratings)
Loading.
Correct Answer
Brandon Buffin Mon, 05/18/2009 - 14:21

Add the command "direct-inward-dial" to dial peers 1 and 2.

Hope this helps.

Brandon

Correct Answer
Paolo Bevilacqua Mon, 05/18/2009 - 14:21

Configure:

dial-peer voice 1

direct-inward-dial

Incidentally, you do not need to specify port for DP 1.

Adrian Saavedra Mon, 05/18/2009 - 16:04

Hi friend,

Just to contribute a little bit in this thread, you can get information about direct-inward-dial (DID), so you can understand what was causing the issue in your voice gateway.

Understanding Direct-Inward-Dial (DID) on IOS Voice Digital (T1/E1) Interfaces:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk653/technologies_tech_note09186a00801142f8.shtml

Cisco CallManager: Understanding Direct-Inward-Dial (DID):

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk653/technologies_tech_note09186a00801c43f6.shtml

Best regards,

- Adrián.

Actions

This Discussion