Unanswered Question
May 28th, 2009

Any one know what "Spoofed packets dropped" and the "Packet pullups needed" are? Is the WAAS dropping packets it thinks it's being spoofed? Also, how can I get rid of the pullups? The WCCP setup is as follows; l2 forward/return to a 3750E stack switch, interfaces are setup as standby and the model is a 7371. I'm not using any WCCP redirect list.

Transparent GRE packets received: 0

Transparent non-GRE packets received: 1940435323

Transparent non-GRE non-WCCP packets received: 0

Total packets accepted: 461319375

Invalid packets received: 731

Packets received with invalid service: 0

Packets received on a disabled service: 0

Packets received too small: 0

Packets dropped due to zero TTL: 0

Packets dropped due to bad buckets: 617

Packets dropped due to no redirect address: 0

Packets dropped due to loopback redirect: 227

Pass-through pkts dropped on assignment update:61

Connections bypassed due to load: 0

Packets sent back to router: 1829

GRE packets sent to router (not bypass): 0

Packets sent to another WAE: 63037

GRE fragments redirected: 1116193

GRE encapsulated fragments received: 0

Packets failed encapsulated reassembly: 0

Packets failed GRE encapsulation: 0

Packets dropped due to invalid fwd method: 0

Packets dropped due to insufficient memory: 0

Packets bypassed, no conn at all: 0

Packets bypassed, no pending connection: 0

Packets due to clean wccp shutdown: 0

Packets bypassed due to bypass-list lookup: 166

Packets received with client IP addresses: 460833489

Spoofed packets dropped: 57416

Conditionally Accepted connections: 0

Conditionally Bypassed connections: 0

L2 Bypass packets destined for loopback: 0

Packets w/WCCP GRE received too small: 0

Packets dropped due to received on loopback: 219

Packets dropped due to IP access-list deny: 0

Packets fragmented for bypass: 0

Packets fragmented for egress: 0

Packet pullups needed: 5484

Packets dropped due to no route found: 0

I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)


This Discussion