hi

so is the queue the port buffer?

how big can the queue be ?

Port buffers are often the term used for queues used directly by port interfaces. I believe on Cisco equipment, they are often refered to as tx or rx rings. Usually don't support a large queue size except on the faster interfaces. You can modify, on some interfaces, the tx-ring size.

Software queues, since they are usually stored in RAM can be quite large. Common defaults for input queues, on Cisco routers, I believe to be about 75, and for output, about 40. Often both can be increased/decreased by the configuration. Believe a common Cisco software queue (logical) max is about 4K (packets).

hi there

so to clarify

the port has port buffers?

and software queues?

please clafify what each is used for ?

Port buffers are queues maintained by the interface port's software and are often very limited in size. This because actual RAM used for port buffers might be tied to a card and/or other special hardware support that allows port to push/pull bits very quickly.

Software queues are queues maintained by the IOS. They would normally be stored in main RAM. They are used to build some kind of ordered list of packets waiting for some processing. One common usage is to hold packets in a queue waiting for a port buffer to accept them.

Since port buffer queues are designed for speed, they also tend to only support very simple queuing, such as FIFO.

Software queues, being managed by IOS, often can support much more complicated queuing. On routers, besides FIFO, you have CQ, PQ, WFQ, CBWFQ, etc., for output software queues.

On switches, since so much queuing is directly tied to the hardware, software queuing is much more limited. A switch's IOS might only use software queuing for control plane functions, e.g. sending pending syslog entries, etc., using a FIFO queue.

Joseph giving a lot of good answers here and getting just a meager "3" ?

Someone should reassess his use of the rating system.

My rating, a "5".