how to combine etherchannel and stp

Unanswered Question
Jun 16th, 2009
User Badges:

Hello all,


I have a question regarding the combination of etherchannel and stp.


My goal is to have four 3560G Switches connected in a ring, with 2GBit/s links between the neighbouring switches. I have connected the switches by channeling two 1GBit/s links for each connection using LACP. Spanning Tree is also working fine, disabling one of the etherchannels to break the ring.


However, I really do need the 2Gbit/s bandwidth (or at least more than 1GBit/s). So if one physical link fails, I would like the whole etherchannel to fail, so that stp would detect a link failure and activate the backup link. But what happens is that if one physical link fails the etherchannel is just reduced to a capacity of 1GBit/s, but still has a link.


Any ideas how to configure the setup I described?


Thanks,

Martin

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
Istvan_Rabai Tue, 06/16/2009 - 05:37
User Badges:
  • Gold, 750 points or more

Hi Martin,


When one of the links fails within an Etherchannel, the spanning-tree cost of the Portchannel interface should increase automatically and the switchover should happen to the backup link.


If not, you can tune the STP port costs with the "spanning-tree vlan x cost" command under the Portchannel interfaces.


Cheers:

Istvan

Giuseppe Larosa Tue, 06/16/2009 - 05:41
User Badges:
  • Super Silver, 17500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

Hello Istvan,

I was thinking of this but the topology is a ring so the STP cost increase can be not enough to switch to blocked link (likely going via more switch hops) it is a question of position of the fault and of the root bridge.


Hope to help

Giuseppe


martin.alt Tue, 06/16/2009 - 12:43
User Badges:

Hello Istvan, hello Giuseppe,


thank you for your quick replies!


In fact you are both right - when a link goes down, the path costs do slightly increase (from 3 to 4) - which is enough for switches that are far away from the root, but does not make links block close to the root bridge.


So now my question is how I can influence the impact on the portchannel path costs that a single link failure has.


Thanks,

Martin

Actions

This Discussion