06-22-2009 11:43 AM - edited 03-04-2019 05:12 AM
Will the following confige cause data slowness, If I am reading it correct, looks like rdp will have a 5% cap on available bandwidth
!
!
policy-map Voip1
class signal
bandwidth percent 8
class rtp
priority percent 80
class RDP
bandwidth percent 5
class class-default
fair-queue
policy-map Parent
class class-default
shape average 1000000
service-policy Voip1
!
!
06-22-2009 12:09 PM
It's not recommended to allocated 80% of the total bandwidth to priority traffic. The rule of thumb is 33% max as that much % can starve other traffic. It seems you are experiencing data starvation in your other classes.
QoS design needs to be understood by the person who is implementing it as there are plenty of variables on each design.
My best recommendation is to read the QoS SRND at this URL:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/solutions/Enterprise/WAN_and_MAN/QoS_SRND/QoS-SRND-Book.html
HTH,
__
Edison.
06-22-2009 07:18 PM
"Will the following confige cause data slowness, If I am reading it correct, looks like rdp will have a 5% cap on available bandwidth "
What do you consider "data slowness"?
RDP isn't capped at 5% with the bandwidth statement, the bandwidth statement guarantees a minimum of 5% (although I believe FQ in class-default can disrupt the guarantee on some platform's IOS). A class using just a bandwidth statement could obtain 100%.
The shaper value of 1,000,000, might be a cause of slowness if more bandwidth was actually available.
06-23-2009 01:57 AM
I don't get it; you re worried about the rest of the traffic, how well will it flow? or about the RDP sessions?
The good thing about bandwidth percent is that it's not FIXED; it's only guarantees that will not drop behind that percentage, but it can go higher if there's available BW, or can use 0, if there s no traffic of that type.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide