Multicast:Confirming understanding IGMP Snooping vs CGMP

Answered Question
Jul 7th, 2009
User Badges:

Hi folks, just want to confirm I understanding this right:


In a modern network, where I am planning to replace access-layer switches with Cisco 3750's - or perhaps even non Cisco switches in certain locations - I could and should just forget CGMP, since that is proprietary.


So my approach is to explore IGMP snooping on access-layer switches. I understand I need to test how that will play with igmp3 since that is how my distribution layer 3 switches are configured.


Is my understanding right?

Correct Answer by Jon Marshall about 7 years 10 months ago

Marlon


If you have a choice between CGMP and IGMP snooping then i would choose IGMP snooping. Apart from the issue you mention about CGMP being Cisco proprietary, IGMP snooping is more efficient on a switch as it is implemented in hardware.


So yes, use IGMP snooping over CGMP.


Jon

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
Loading.
Correct Answer
Jon Marshall Tue, 07/07/2009 - 13:58
User Badges:
  • Super Blue, 32500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, WAN

Marlon


If you have a choice between CGMP and IGMP snooping then i would choose IGMP snooping. Apart from the issue you mention about CGMP being Cisco proprietary, IGMP snooping is more efficient on a switch as it is implemented in hardware.


So yes, use IGMP snooping over CGMP.


Jon

Actions

This Discussion