LMS 3.1 to 3.2 upgrade

Answered Question
Jul 21st, 2009

We have 2 LMS 3.1 systems running in a Master-Slave configuration and want to upgrade to LMS 3.2. Is there any preference as to which system should be upgraded first, or does it matter? I could not find anything in the Data Migration guide regarding Master-Slave configurations. Thanks

I have this problem too.
0 votes
Correct Answer by Marvin Rhoads about 7 years 6 months ago

You should upgrade the Master server first. After that has been successfully completed, you should restart daemon manager on the slave prior to upgrading it.

Hope this helps.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
Loading.
Correct Answer
Marvin Rhoads Tue, 07/21/2009 - 07:18

You should upgrade the Master server first. After that has been successfully completed, you should restart daemon manager on the slave prior to upgrading it.

Hope this helps.

chris.mcgarrah@... Tue, 07/21/2009 - 09:27

Yes that helps very much, thank you.

Out of curiosity, is there any place where that is documented?

Marvin Rhoads Tue, 07/21/2009 - 10:22

A nod to our resident Cisco expert, Joe Clarke, for the original answer to this question - it was covered in an earlier posting: http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&forum=Network%20Infrastructure&topic=Network%20Management&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Dpass_through%26location%3Doutline%40%5E1%40%40.2cd358f6/0#selected_message

The procedure is also documented (albeit briefly) in the "Installing and Getting Started with CiscoWorks LAN Management Solution 3.2" document. The relevant section is here: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/net_mgmt/ciscoworks_lan_management_solution/3.2/install/guide1/overview.html#wp1086033

Hope this helps.

Actions

This Discussion