I currently use CSS's in a combination of bridged and routed mode and I'm preparing to deploy 6500's with CSM's to replace them. I've been reading the CSM installation and config guide and I'm torn between keeping the same design or trying to change my design to be exclusively bridged or exclusively routed.
The problem I'm having is regarding the "cons" listed for bridged mode.
From the Guide:
"Bridge mode: The CSM does not bridge server to server traffic. This traffic is routed by the default gateway, and
flows through the CSM in both directions. Therefore, server to server traffic consumes significant
CSM resources in bridge mode."
I have two application types, one that is high-bandwidth server-server and high-bandwidth server to client, and one that is low bandwidth server-to-server, and low bandwidth server to client.
In my current deployment, I have the high-bandwidth application in routed mode, and the server-server communication is actually done through a separate subnet behind the server. (Each server is connected to the CSS backend vlan, and a separate "data" vlan.
My low bandwidth app servers are in the same subnet as the CSS and bridge the connections using groups and destination services.
Is there anything wrong with this setup or should I be trying to fit both application types into the CSM routed or CSM bridged mode?
Thanks in advance,