08-12-2009 01:33 PM - edited 03-06-2019 07:13 AM
08-12-2009 01:42 PM
yes, transparent but make sure to manually prune the unwanted vlans on the trunks, on a one-on-one basis.
For instance, if a particular trunk only needs to carry vlans 1,5-10 and 20 do:
config-if)#switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,5-10,20
This will help you reduce traffic
08-12-2009 01:45 PM
Hello,
Purely theoretically, the VTP Transparent mode prevents a switch from sending any VTP packets, so the Transparent mode is indeed the most bandwidth saver.
However, even with VTP Server or Client modes, the bandwidth consumption is absolutely negligible. In a stable network where no changes to the VLAN database are being performed, switches only send the VTP summary advertisements in intervals of 5 minutes. From this viewpoint, a spanning tree protocol consumes far more bandwidth (and even with STP, the actual bandwidth consumption is negligible).
Best regards,
Peter
08-12-2009 01:46 PM
Hi Neo,
VTP Transparent mode will not reduces bandwidth by default. It will forward all VLAN out to the trunk port with the default configuration. However, you can manually prune VLAN's that you don't want on a trunk link with the following interface level command:
To allow VLAN x,y,z
switchport trunk allowed vlan x,y,z
To remove VLAN a,b,c
switchport trunk allowed vlan remove a,b,c
You can do the same thing with VTP Server/Client mode with VTP prune turned on.
HTH,
jerry
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: