Hi,

Is the name display works now?

I have the same problem between Cisco and Aastra...

As tu réussi à faire afficher le nom?

J'ai le même problème entre Cisco et Aastra...

Thanks

can you send the screenshot of h323 config on the cucm

and debug h225 asn1 and debug isdn q931 on the gw.

thanks

-abu

Hi,

you can find screenshots and debug in attached piece.

here's an extract of the gw config:

!
voice service voip
qsig decode
allow-connections h323 to h323
allow-connections h323 to sip
allow-connections sip to h323
supplementary-service h450.12
h323
  h225 timeout ntf 300
  h225 display-ie ccm-compatible
!
!
voice class codec 1
codec preference 1 g711ulaw
codec preference 2 g711alaw
codec preference 3 g729br8
!
voice class codec 2
codec preference 1 g711ulaw
codec preference 2 g711alaw
codec preference 3 g729br8
!
!
!
voice class h323 1
h225 timeout tcp establish 5
h225 timeout ntf 300
h225 display-ie ccm-compatible
!

interface Serial0/2/0:15
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-qsig
isdn timer T310 120000
isdn overlap-receiving
isdn protocol-emulate network
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn map address *. plan isdn type unknown
isdn supp-service name calling ie 40 cs 0 profile Network-Extensions operation-value-tag local
isdn sending-complete
isdn outgoing ie facility
isdn outgoing display-ie
isdn outgoing ie caller-number
no cdp enable

Did this ever get resolved?  I'm having exactly the same issue at the moment but many of the commands don't work as I'musing fa0/0 rather than serial.

Best Regards

Tim

Hi Tim

If you are trying to apply commands to an Fa interface to resolve calling name issues, you may have well and truly lost your way :-)

Probably best to kick off a new thread describing your software, topology and problem.

Aaron

Hi Aaron

Not lost my way completely, Panasonic PBX's send the QSIG Q.931 packet over IP when using IP Gateways.  Normally this is not a problem as most communication is from Panasonic to Panasonic.

Unfortunately it seems that the "isdn supplementary-service name calling" command cannot be applied to an fa port depsite it still being able to support H.323 calling

I've created the following post but it doesn't seem to be a common issue:

https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2027857

Thank you for taking the time to reply however.

Best Regards

Tim Shipp

Will follow up on the other thread - the point is that the fa interface is a transit interface for the H.323 traffic. The commands starting 'isdn' are specific to (you guess it) the ISDN protocol, which doesn't run over ethernet; it runs over BRI or PRI ports (PRIs appearing as serial ports in the config).

Regards

Aaron

Thanks Aaron

My knowledge of how this works on the Cisco side is a blur to me, any help will be greatly appreciated.

Best Regards

Tim