09-14-2009 10:20 AM - edited 03-04-2019 06:02 AM
i have the broadband on fa0/0 and the metro e on fa0/0/0. is it possible that both of these interfaces are configured for outside nat and can the metro e be set for the primary?
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-14-2009 10:33 AM
See:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_configuration_example09186a00808d2b72.shtml
Note you will also need to reduce NAT timers and few more twists not describe in the document.
Please remember to rate useful posts with the scrollbox below.
09-14-2009 10:27 AM
Yes, it is possible. Note for true fastethernet performances a 1841 is not enough.
09-14-2009 10:29 AM
How would I make the metro e on Fa0/0/0 the primary? it seems that i have 2 overload statements when i pull out the metro E circuit i have to remove the overload statement for that interface to get the broadband cable circuit working.
09-14-2009 10:33 AM
See:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_configuration_example09186a00808d2b72.shtml
Note you will also need to reduce NAT timers and few more twists not describe in the document.
Please remember to rate useful posts with the scrollbox below.
09-14-2009 10:44 AM
can you give me info on reducing nat timers?
09-14-2009 10:59 AM
Make a working config first. NAT timers it's a just simple self-explaining config.
09-14-2009 11:36 AM
just wondering which statement from the document makes the interface the primary?
09-14-2009 11:42 AM
The default static route with lesser weight.
(I haven't fully checked the document, it may contain errors for what I know)
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: