Seeing %MLS-4-FIB_TCAM_FULL:FIB TCAM full

Unanswered Question
Sep 28th, 2009
User Badges:

I have a customer that is seeing the following error message:

%MLS-4-FIB_TCAM_FULL:FIB TCAM full


This message indicates that a new FIB entry could not be installed in the hardware FIB TCAM table because the table is full. As a result, any packets that encounter a hardware FIB lookup miss will be sent to the MSFC for software forwarding.


Recommended Action: This is a hardware restriction. You can reduce the number of routes on the switch by load sharing with other switches or upgrade the supervisor engine to a larger FIB TCAM capacity.


Is there a supervisor card that will have a larger FIB TCAM capacity than a SUP720?



  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
Giuseppe Larosa Mon, 09/28/2009 - 11:29
User Badges:
  • Super Silver, 17500 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

Hello Richard,

not all sup720 are equal in terms of routing table and TCAM size.


unless you have already a Sup 720 3CXL or sup720 3BXL you should have some margin of improvement.


clearly this can be a sign that you have too many BGP upstream providers on same device for example


see


http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps9336/product_data_sheet0900aecd806ed759_ps708_Products_Data_Sheet.html


or


http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps9336/product_data_sheet0900aecd806ed759_ps708_Products_Data_Sheet.html


and comparison of all sup720 -xx



http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/product_data_sheet09186a0080159856.html


Also there are the RSP720 processor family for 7600 to be considered


or you need to move to GSR with PRP2 or ASR 1006 but this is a major change.


Hope to help

Giuseppe


Actions

This Discussion