10-29-2009 11:52 AM - edited 03-04-2019 06:33 AM
I have not done much config with Clocking so I am looking for some guidence. The reason for this is I am seeing a lot of slips....see below.
2821#show invcontrollers e1
E1 0/2/0 is up.
Applique type is Channelized E1 - balanced
Cablelength is Unknown
Description:
No alarms detected.
alarm-trigger is not set
Version info Firmware: 20080918, FPGA: 13, spm_count = 0
Framing is NO-CRC4, Line Code is HDB3, Clock Source is Line.
Data in current interval (25 seconds elapsed):
0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations
0 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins
0 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs
Total Data (last 24 hours)
1797 Line Code Violations, 255 Path Code Violations,
4457 Slip Secs, 1 Fr Loss Secs, 4 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins,
4460 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 1 Severely Err Secs, 29 Unavail Secs
E1 0/2/1 is up.
Applique type is Channelized E1 - balanced
Cablelength is Unknown
Description:
No alarms detected.
alarm-trigger is not set
Version info Firmware: 20080918, FPGA: 13, spm_count = 0
Framing is CRC4, Line Code is HDB3, Clock Source is Line.
Data in current interval (26 seconds elapsed):
0 Line Code Violations, 0 Path Code Violations
1 Slip Secs, 0 Fr Loss Secs, 0 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins
1 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 0 Severely Err Secs, 0 Unavail Secs
Total Data (last 24 hours)
148 Line Code Violations, 3436 Path Code Violations,
1747 Slip Secs, 12 Fr Loss Secs, 11 Line Err Secs, 0 Degraded Mins,
1747 Errored Secs, 0 Bursty Err Secs, 12 Severely Err Secs, 140 Unavail Secs
Here is the show inv output and what the config is now and what I think I should change.
2821#show inv
NAME: "2821 chassis", DESCR: "2821 chassis"
PID: CISCO2821 , VID: V04 , SN:
NAME: "VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 - 2-Port RJ-48 Multiflex Trunk - T1/E1 on Slot 0 SubSlot 2", DESCR: "VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 - 2-Port RJ-48 Multiflex Trunk - T1/E1"
PID: VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 , VID: V01 , SN:
NAME: "2nd generation four port FXO voice interface daughtercard on Slot 0 SubSlot 3", DESCR: "2nd generation four port FXO voice interface daughtercard"
PID: VIC2-4FXO , VID: V01 , SN:
NAME: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with four DSPs on Slot 0 SubSlot 4", DESCR: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with four DSPs"
PID: PVDM2-64 , VID: V01 , SN:
NAME: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with one DSP on Slot 0 SubSlot 5", DESCR: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with one DSP"
PID: PVDM2-16 , VID: V01 , SN:
Here is the current config......
card type e1 0 2
network-clock-participate wic 2
controller E1 0/2/0
framing NO-CRC4
channel-group 0 timeslots 1-16
controller E1 0/2/1
pri-group timeslots 1-31 service mgcp
interface Serial0/2/0:0
description WAN
ip address 200.67.9.10 255.255.255.252
encapsulation ppp
service-policy output LLQ-POLICY
interface Serial0/2/1:15
no ip address
encapsulation hdlc
isdn switch-type primary-net5
isdn incoming-voice voice
isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager
no cdp enable
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I want to make these changes
network-clock-participate slot 0
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/0
and leave the rest as is.
How far off am I or should I do something else?
Thanks,
Mike
Solved! Go to Solution.
11-02-2009 06:38 PM
No problems.
You can rate any post at any time.
You can mark any post in reply to your threads, at any time.
10-29-2009 12:01 PM
These are the commands you need, but taking clock form the voice circuit should be better, as data doesn-t suffer much from slips.
10-29-2009 12:13 PM
Should I do it for both circuits?
Mike
10-29-2009 12:21 PM
Are these circuits from different carriers? If so, I'd just set independent clocking on the controllers.
10-29-2009 12:38 PM
Yes, Different carriers. So I should do this?
Remove this....
network-clock-participate wic 2
add this
network-clock-participate slot 0
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/0
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/1
Thanks,
Mike
10-29-2009 01:25 PM
You cannot have multiple sources to same priority. Leave participate for wic and select priority for voice T1.
10-29-2009 02:00 PM
The int 0/2/1 is just PRI backup the 0/2/0 is Voip and Data. I would leave the network-clock-participate wic 2 ?
and just add...
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/0
Thanks
Mike
10-29-2009 03:40 PM
One or the other as priority 1, and check the results.
Please remember to rate useful posts with the scrollbox below.
10-30-2009 05:28 AM
Let me re-word this as I am still a little confused. Based on all the information above and where my WIC cards are installed should this be how I configure this...if not please post what I should be doing. Interface 0/2/0 is VoIP and data and the most important circuit, Interface 0/2/1 is backup PRI's provided by a different vendor. With that said here is what I think I should do but please let me know if that is incorrect or what my config should be...
I think I should remove
network-clock-participate wic 2
And then I should add
network-clock-participate slot 0
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/0
network-clock-select 2 E1 0/2/1
Or should I do something else?
Thanks,
Mike
10-30-2009 06:00 AM
I have indicated already and repeatedly the appropriate configuration. That is, 100% correct and verifiable information.
Then, I'm not sure from who and why I got low ratings in this thread. If it is from you Mike, I can only say that is wrong attitude toward me, good luck.
10-30-2009 06:10 AM
The information you provided has been good. Like I said in the begining I have not done very much configuring with Clocking and I am just trying to confirm what I have learned from you post which have helped me get to where I am. What I am trying to get answered is what you have given me so far which has helped and based on that am I correct in doint this config?
I think I should remove
network-clock-participate wic 2
And then I should add
network-clock-participate slot 0
network-clock-select 1 E1 0/2/0
network-clock-select 2 E1 0/2/1
Or should I do something else?
I was hoping for a yes that looks correct or no you should do this instead. Your posts so far have been helpful and I truly appreceate you help.
Thanks,
Mike
10-30-2009 06:26 AM
I just checked how the ratings worked because I was in no way deminishing your help. I see with my ratings it will impact your over all rating. I was being too literal in my ratings and should have rated as an overall. I do appolgize for my misundersatnding and your post have helped me alot.
Thanks,
Mike
11-02-2009 12:58 PM
p.bevilacqua,
I was wondering if you could reply to this so I could mark this as solution recieved. I put the config you listed and all worked great. Thanks for your help and I am sorry for any misunderstandings, you of great help.
Thanks,
Mike
11-02-2009 06:38 PM
No problems.
You can rate any post at any time.
You can mark any post in reply to your threads, at any time.
11-03-2009 08:09 AM
Thanks for your help on this. After I finally got it through my thick skull what you were saying I got it. It has been a very busy couple months so I was a little off. Again thanks for your help.
Thanks,
Mike
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: