12-10-2009 11:31 AM - edited 03-04-2019 06:56 AM
Hi Folks,
I got a 1760 router with 2 adsl wics, but what happens is that both cards are always- down - down -, even if I execute the -no shutdown- command in the interface mode.Here you got some commands.
**************************************************************************************
Router(config-if)#do show ip inter brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Prot
ocol
FastEthernet0/0 192.168.10.100 YES manual up up
ATM1/0 unassigned YES manual down down
ATM0/0 unassigned YES unset administratively down down
**************************************************************************************
Router(config-if)#do show diag
Slot 0:
C1760 1FE VE 4SLOT DV Mainboard Port adapter, 3 ports
Port adapter is analyzed
Port adapter insertion time unknown
EEPROM contents at hardware discovery:
Hardware Revision : 5.0
PCB Serial Number : FOC073610L0
Part Number : 73-7167-05
Board Revision : B0
Fab Version : 04
Product (FRU) Number : CISCO1760
EEPROM format version 4
EEPROM contents (hex):
0x00: 04 FF 40 03 16 41 05 00 C1 8B 46 4F 43 30 37 33
0x10: 36 31 30 4C 30 82 49 1B FF 05 42 42 30 02 04 FF
0x20: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x30: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x40: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x50: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x60: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
0x70: FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF
WIC/VIC Slot 0:
Alcatel 20150 ADSL WIC
Daughter card-Version 4 TLV Cookie Format
Hardware Revision : 2.3
Part Number : 73-4771-09
Board Revision : C0
Deviation Number : 0-0
Fab Version : 05
PCB Serial Number : FOC09414VF7
RMA Test History : 00
RMA Number : 0-0-0-0
RMA History : 00
Product (FRU) Number : WIC-1ADSL=
WIC/VIC Slot 1:
Alcatel 20150 ADSL WIC
Daughter card-Version 4 TLV Cookie Format
Hardware Revision : 2.3
Part Number : 73-4771-08
Board Revision : B0
Deviation Number : 0-0
Fab Version : 05
PCB Serial Number : FOC07312123
RMA Test History : 00
RMA Number : 0-0-0-0
RMA History : 00
Product (FRU) Number : WIC-1ADSL=
**********************************************************************
Router(config-if)#do show version
Cisco Internetwork Operating System Software
IOS (tm) C1700 Software (C1700-K8SY7-M), Version 12.2(15)ZL1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT R
ELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Synched to technology version 12.3(0.1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
Copyright (c) 1986-2003 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 13-Oct-03 21:49 by ealyon
Image text-base: 0x80008120, data-base: 0x8112334C
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.2(7r)XM2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
ROM: C1700 Software (C1700-K8SY7-M), Version 12.2(15)ZL1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT RELEA
SE SOFTWARE (fc1)
*********************************************************************************************************************
I want to know why it behaves like this, because I want to mount my adsl services over this router since a month ago but I always got a new trouble.
Solved! Go to Solution.
12-11-2009 05:25 AM
Hello Francis,
if the interface is up/up now clearly there is OSI layer1 compatibility and yes ADSL2+ is backward compatible with ADSL.
If your provider is using MER you need a different configuration.
saying that MER is like RFC 1483 bridging means:
IPv4/Eth/AAL5/ATM/DSL
your current configuration is classic IP over ATM:
IPv4/AAL5/ATM/DSL
a possible configuration that can help is the usage of IRB, integrated routing and bridging
int eth0
no ip address
bridge-group 1
int atm1/0
no ip address
int atm1/0.1 point-to-point
no ip address
bridge-group 1
pvc 8/35
encapsulation aal5snap
in BVI1
! set here the ip address
ip address
bridge 1 protocol ieee
bridge 1 route ip
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 BVI1
there is a more compact configuration using RBE, but this is more easy to understand at first.
to see RBE
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk175/tk15/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080093e5f.shtml
PVC 8/35 is typically used for bridged implementation on Alcatel based chipset.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
12-10-2009 11:47 AM
Make sure you have read: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/access/1700/software/feature/guide/1700ADSL.html
There's a few potential causes. The first is that you may need to have a special crossover cable to bring up your DSL. I found this was common when I was deploying home-offices with routers handling the ADSL. You need a CAB-ADSL-RJ11X= if you have a DSL filter/splitter in the wall. From Cisco Docs:
"Cable Information
Another callout to this same cable:
"If you are connecting a Cisco 1700 series router with an ADSL WIC to an RJ-11 wall jack that has the ADSL pair wired for pins 2 and 5, you must use the lavender crossover cable with the blue stripe. The crossover cable is orderable as a spare."
Second, can you please provide a configuration dump so we can examine your config? Who is your provider, and what information have you collected to configure the interface? You usually need the VPI and VC numbers from your provider to configure the pvc on the interface, as well as if you are going to be using bridged ethernet or ppp on the circuit. You also need to know if they are using aal5snap or another encapsulation type.
I'll assist you further once you respond with the additional information. Please rate if this helps you.
Cheers,
Tim
12-10-2009 12:01 PM
Hello Francis,
I've searched with feature navigator at
search by feature: ADSL
I would try with a newer IOS image like
c1700-sy7-mz.124-25a.bin |
I had similar problems with a C3640 some mounths ago.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
12-10-2009 03:32 PM
Hi folks,
After I upgrade the IOS to the c1700-sy7-mz.124-25a.bin I have this result.
Router#show ip inter brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Prot
ocol
ATM0/0 unassigned YES NVRAM down down
FastEthernet0/0 unassigned YES manual up up
ATM1/0 unassigned YES NVRAM initializing down
Now just stay initializing all the time. There is something that I want to explain.
My ISP is using a method called MER because I got a ADSL modem that was running that protocol, I want to replace it for the cisco 1760 but I don't know what is the equivalent of this for cisco, if u can plz can help me with some guideline or template.
12-11-2009 12:05 AM
Hello Francis,
MER is a type of encapsulation that should match with RFC 1483 bridged or RBE in cisco terms with ethernet frames carried inside AAL5 PDUs.
In your case you have a problem at OSI physical layer (lower level)
Verify with your provider specification what type of ADSL they provide:
ADSL
ADSL2 not backward compatible to ADSL
ADSL2+ backward compatible to ADSL
your WIC should support ADSL not ADSL2. So if DSLAM is ADSL2 there is an issue.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
12-11-2009 05:04 AM
Hi giuslar,
I think that your answer is logic, thanks, then... Can my Wic be operable with adsl2+ then? I'm using this configuration in the interface and is up up but there is not transmition, I cannot even make ping to the ip address of the interface interface. What do u think?
interface ATM1/0
no ip address
no atm ilmi-keepalive
dsl operating-mode auto
!
interface ATM1/0.1 point-to-point
ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
pvc 8/35
encapsulation aal5snap
Regards,
Francis
12-11-2009 05:25 AM
Hello Francis,
if the interface is up/up now clearly there is OSI layer1 compatibility and yes ADSL2+ is backward compatible with ADSL.
If your provider is using MER you need a different configuration.
saying that MER is like RFC 1483 bridging means:
IPv4/Eth/AAL5/ATM/DSL
your current configuration is classic IP over ATM:
IPv4/AAL5/ATM/DSL
a possible configuration that can help is the usage of IRB, integrated routing and bridging
int eth0
no ip address
bridge-group 1
int atm1/0
no ip address
int atm1/0.1 point-to-point
no ip address
bridge-group 1
pvc 8/35
encapsulation aal5snap
in BVI1
! set here the ip address
ip address
bridge 1 protocol ieee
bridge 1 route ip
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 BVI1
there is a more compact configuration using RBE, but this is more easy to understand at first.
to see RBE
https://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk175/tk15/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080093e5f.shtml
PVC 8/35 is typically used for bridged implementation on Alcatel based chipset.
Hope to help
Giuseppe
12-11-2009 06:29 AM
Thank you soooo much Giuslar,
I have configured the the router like this and It worked.
!
interface ATM1/0
no ip address
no atm ilmi-keepalive
dsl operating-mode auto
!
interface ATM1/0.1 point-to-point
bridge-group 1
pvc 8/35
encapsulation aal5snap
!
!
interface BVI1
ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
!
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: