LMS Database consistency verification tool

Answered Question
Dec 18th, 2009
User Badges:

Hello all,


I upgraded from LMS 3.1 to 3.2 yesterday. The upgrade went well, but DFM and Campus Manager didn't work afterwards.


After a few searches on the forum, and the help of a great Cisco TAC engineer, we were able to solve the PIDM database inconsistencies that were preventing DFM links from showing up. And Campus Manager needed a kick in the butt to start again it seems.


My PIDM table had many duplicate device ids, some registered to DFM 2.0 (on the previous server) and some registered to DFM 3.1 (current server). So it seems the previous upgrade (from 2.6 to 3.0 and then 3.1) had some bad entries.


My question for the pros is this : is there a tool that can be run against the LMS databases to check for inconsistencies like these ? Duplicate entries, wrong server names, application version, and other nasty stuff ?


My next chore is to move LMS from Windows 2003 to Windows 2008, but before I do that, I'd like to make sure the DB is clean


Thanks!


Alex.

Correct Answer by Joe Clarke about 7 years 7 months ago

No, there are no tools to verify data consistency.  There is a tool to validate the file structure consistency of the database, but if the database is running, that is typically not an issue.


The PIDM table is the source of quite a few problems, but they are generally easy to sort out.  If you have a good backup of your 2003 server data, I would say you can do the 2008 migration.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
Loading.
Correct Answer
Joe Clarke Fri, 12/18/2009 - 10:42
User Badges:
  • Cisco Employee,
  • Hall of Fame,

    Founding Member

No, there are no tools to verify data consistency.  There is a tool to validate the file structure consistency of the database, but if the database is running, that is typically not an issue.


The PIDM table is the source of quite a few problems, but they are generally easy to sort out.  If you have a good backup of your 2003 server data, I would say you can do the 2008 migration.

Actions

This Discussion

Related Content