cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
11818
Views
2
Helpful
9
Replies

%SIBYTE-DFC3-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL

peteroseneff
Level 1
Level 1

Hello!

Jan 19 20:57:46 MSK: %SIBYTE-DFC3-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 263)

Jan 19 20:57:46 MSK: %SIBYTE-DFC8-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 268)

Jan 19 20:57:46 MSK: %SIBYTE-DFC7-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 255)

Cisco 7609 with RSP720. Unforutantely I was unable to find this type of message on cisco.com. Does anybody know what does this exaclty mean?

P.S. All I gat is the only link http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/modules/ps2033/products_tech_note09186a008009446d.shtml#topic5

Thanks.

Peter.

9 Replies 9

Itzcoatl Espinosa
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi Peter,

Here is the explanation of the messages.

%SIBYTE-DFC4-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 1)

These messages basically mean that excessive collisions have occurred on the MAC
interface.


A small number of excessive collisions is not a problem at all.  It is the nature of
bus-based Ethernet. The reason you saw the message message maybe because you have configured
the "service internal" on your switch.  If you change the configuration (no service
internal), he will not see the error message at all.

With service internal mode off, the system will only print out such message whenever the
excessive collision reaches a certain fixed threshold. In this case, the appearance of
this message may indicate a real collision case.

With the service internal mode on, the system will print out such message whenever there
is one instance of excessive collision. It may be caused by some hardware noise.  The
occasional appearance of this message with service internal mode on is a normal behavior.

I hope this information could help you.

Itzcoatl Espinosa

hi

thx for the explantion. But what kind of interface is mac 1 on a 6509 with SUP720?

Regards

Artur

Could it be a device slot no.?

Hi

yes would make sense... I've got 2 messages:

1711390: Feb 21 11:04:21 GMT: %SIBYTE-DFC2-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 8311)

1711391: Feb 21 11:04:52 GMT: %SIBYTE-DFC1-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 9189)

But i would mean that the whole slot 1 and 2 had collisions on the switching matrix. This brings us back to what kind of interface it is .. maybe some kind of management interface on the slot?
Kind regards
Artur

Artur,

Good question...

Well, I was told that if there're not too much collisions on counters - it's OK. Otherwise - you have to do something.

in the end i openend a TAC case:

it a collision on the out-of-band-ethernet management bus   (EOBC) for the line cards only. it is not critical. you can disable it with command no service internal.

Regards

Artur

shakilkhan9389
Level 1
Level 1

Hi - can any one help i am having the same error message- what is it

 

EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 3701)

 

shakilkhan9389
Level 1
Level 1

what is the cause of this

 

121127: Jul 12 19:31:35.236 UTC: %SIBYTE-DFC1-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 4510)
121128: Jul 12 19:31:35.356 UTC: %SIBYTE-DFC2-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 4059)
121129: Jul 12 19:31:35.360 UTC: %SIBYTE-DFC8-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 3298)
121130: Jul 12 19:31:35.520 UTC: %SIBYTE-DFC4-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 1397338)
121131: Jul 12 19:31:35.628 UTC: %SIBYTE-DFC3-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 1396399)
121132: Jul 12 19:31:35.276 UTC: %SIBYTE-DFC7-4-SB_EXCESS_COLL: Excessive collisions on mac 1 (count: 3701)

It seems to me that a previous post was pretty clear about the cause of this and about what to do to resolve it

it a collision on the out-of-band-ethernet management bus   (EOBC) for the line cards only. it is not critical. you can disable it with command no service internal.

 

What causes this error - it is a collision on the management bus and so does not impact user traffic.

Is it an important error - no it is not important.

How to resolve it - configure no service internal

 

HTH

 

Rick

 

 

HTH

Rick
Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card