untagged prefixes...

Unanswered Question
Feb 19th, 2010

read following on two forums:

Reference I

Untagged Label:- Untagged label in the LFIB when the IP prefix is a directly connected interface, a summary route or the next-hop router has not advertised the label.

http://www.mplsvpn.info/2009/03/untagged-labels-coming-instead-of-pop.html

Reference II............

Summary: you would see the Untagged label in the LFIB when the IP prefix is a directly connected interface, a summary route or the next-hop router has not advertised the label.

As per my understanding:

LFIB doesnot contain directly connected prefixes, since the local router requests a POP action from its adjacent LDP neighbors for directly connected prefixes.

Therefore it does not receive a labeled packet for directly connected prefixes and does not have have to lookup in LFIB for them..

Regards,

MukarraM

I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
Laurent Aubert Fri, 02/19/2010 - 13:45

Correct. Also an implicit null label will be associated to any summary routes. So the only case where you should see "untagged label" should be when you allocated a label to a prefix and you never received one from the downstream peer.

HTH

Laurent.

Actions

This Discussion