2106 Controller - Why only two PoE ports?

Unanswered Question

Hi,


I am trying to build a solution for an SMB with mutliple access points for an indoor and outdoor solution (with Antennas), and looking for a cost effective controller. Looking at the 2106 I was wondering why only two PoE ports? Wouldn't it make sense to make them all PoE so you can power all AP's?


Thanks in advance,


Bob James


PS Let me also ask, how do you support 802.11n with only a 100Mbps Ethernet port?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 5 (1 ratings)
Loading.
Christian Isla Fri, 01/14/2011 - 08:06
User Badges:

Then you would be installing all 6-7 AP's in about a 250ft radius.

Leo Laohoo Fri, 01/14/2011 - 21:05
User Badges:
  • Super Gold, 25000 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    The Hall of Fame designation is a lifetime achievement award based on significant overall achievements in the community. 

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, Wireless


PS Let me also ask, how do you support 802.11n with only a 100Mbps Ethernet port?

You don't.   2100 wasn't meant to support Gig interface of the AP.  It was meant to be for testing and toying around.  It was also meant to support 1130/1240 and older.



Looking at the 2106 I was wondering why only two PoE ports?

Because it was plainly meant for testing purposes only.

Leo Laohoo Sat, 01/15/2011 - 20:01
User Badges:
  • Super Gold, 25000 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    The Hall of Fame designation is a lifetime achievement award based on significant overall achievements in the community. 

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, Wireless

Thanks for the ratings.

Not sure if you are trying to be funny, or that was a serious answer.


Most competitors have all PoE ports, and I'm not saying I want to use them all, just thought it makes sense. As well, with the introduction of the new C series switches that can be run over PoE, just seems logical.


And as for the question or 100M interfaces, even if you want to run 1 AP off the WLC, 100M for the newer AP's is a bottleneck.



Bob James

Leo Laohoo Sun, 01/16/2011 - 13:21
User Badges:
  • Super Gold, 25000 points or more
  • Hall of Fame,

    The Hall of Fame designation is a lifetime achievement award based on significant overall achievements in the community. 

  • Cisco Designated VIP,

    2017 LAN, Wireless


Not sure if you are trying to be funny, or that was a serious answer.

I'm trying not to be funny.  I was also trying to be serious but not that serious as to be mis-interpreted as being condescending or disrespectful.



Most competitors have all PoE ports, and I'm not saying I want to use them all, just thought it makes sense. As well, with the introduction of the new C series switches that can be run over PoE, just seems logical.

No arguments there.



And as for the question or 100M interfaces, even if you want to run 1 AP off the WLC, 100M for the newer AP's is a bottleneck.

True.

Actions

This Discussion

 

 

Trending Topics: Other Wireless Mobility

client could not be authenticated
Network Analysis Module (NAM) Products
Cisco 6500 nam
reason 440 driver failure
Cisco password cracker
Cisco Wireless mode