LMS 3.2 vlan configuration

Unanswered Question
Mar 10th, 2010

Hi,

I have some port to configure to have a vlan + a voice vlan. How can i do that using LMS 3.2 ?

I have check the vlan port assignement but i haven't seen a option to define 2 vlan.

typically our port are configure like this one

interface FastEthernet0/1/1
switchport access vlan 2
switchport voice vlan 100
macro description cisco-phone | cisco-phone
spanning-tree portfast

and i wish to use LMS to configure new port.

Cheers

I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
Joe Clarke Wed, 03/10/2010 - 11:20

You can use Netconfig in RME to do what you want.  RME 4.3 has port-based Netconfig functionality which will greatly facilitate what you want to do.  Just create a new Netconfig port-based job, and create a new Adhoc task to specify the configuration you require.

MathieuJM_2 Thu, 03/11/2010 - 08:01

Is there really no way to do it using a GUI ?

How should i simply wish interface i wish to configure ?

MathieuJM_2 Fri, 03/26/2010 - 06:32

What i mean is that can i have a gui that let me choose which vlan

i wish to add to port ?

we have different voice vlan and different data vlan, can i have a gui that let me choose one of the data vlan and optionnaly a voice vlan ?

i don't understand how to do that

MathieuJM_2 Fri, 04/09/2010 - 03:33

Hi,

thanks for this request from your part.

In order to be able to configure the port of my switch with my configuration VLAN voice + VLAN data, how do i must use the netconfig tool ?

Can you help me creating the right job that eventually let me enter the port of the switch as a variable ?$

Regards

Joe Clarke Fri, 04/09/2010 - 23:27

I think what might be easiest is to go to RME > Config Mgmt > Netconfig > Netconfig Jobs, and create a new Port-based job.  Then, define an ad-hoc rule to match the port or ports you want.  For example:

Port.PortName equals Fa0/3

Then, create an Adhoc Task which defines the VLAN values that you require.

Actions

This Discussion