guest anchor mobility group

Unanswered Question
Mar 19th, 2010
User Badges:

I have 2 anchor controllers in a DMZ to provide redundancy for guest access. They are configured with the same default Mobility group name which is different from the local controller Mobility names. My local controllers include both anchor controllerss in their mobility groups configuration. The anchor controllers provide DHCP for guest access, but with different IP subpool addresses.

Do I have to include both DMZ anchor controllers as well as the local controllers in the mobility groups which are configured on the DMZ controllers?

Would the DMZ controllers communicate with each other - if so, what information would be exchange e.g. client status?

Does symmetric tunnelling have to be configured?


  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
dancampb Fri, 03/19/2010 - 06:23
User Badges:
  • Cisco Employee,

I would add both DMZ controller to eachother's mobility group list.  This way if a client roams from a controller that is anchored to WLC-A to a controller anchored to WLC-B the client's session could be handed off.


This Discussion