04-20-2010 08:50 AM - edited 03-04-2019 08:13 AM
We are adding 3 mpls sites that will terminate into a 3750 but cannot rurn EIGRP. This 3750 also terminates other Metro LAN offices as well that run EIGRP. Am I better off running OSPF and redistributing between EIGRP or running static routes for the MPLS?
Thanks in advance.
04-20-2010 09:02 AM
jgorman1977 wrote:
We are adding 3 mpls sites that will terminate into a 3750 but cannot rurn EIGRP. This 3750 also terminates other Metro LAN offices as well that run EIGRP. Am I better off running OSPF and redistributing between EIGRP or running static routes for the MPLS?
Thanks in advance.
Personally for 3 sites i would use statics and simply redistribute those statics into EIGRP. Easier to configure and a less overhead on the switch not having to run another dynamic routing protocol.
Edit - the above assumes you don't have a huge amount of statics per site, hopefully you can summarise each site ?
Jon
04-20-2010 09:27 AM
Jon,
Thanks for the advice. Another question for you about the 3750. The provider gave me a CE ip, so I would just create a layer 3 interface for that ip and create a vlan interface for our Internal subnet? I get confused on the 3750.
Thanks
04-20-2010 11:29 AM
jgorman1977 wrote:
Jon,
Thanks for the advice. Another question for you about the 3750. The provider gave me a CE ip, so I would just create a layer 3 interface for that ip and create a vlan interface for our Internal subnet? I get confused on the 3750.
Thanks
Yes. On the port that connect to the provider -
int gi1/0/1
no switchport
ip address x.x.x.x
and then for your internal vlans you just have L3 vlan interfaces eg.
int vlan 10
ip address 192.168.5.1 255.255.255.0
etc. for each vlan.
Jon
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide