Following is the architecture.
Thers no CM sub at sideB. As per SRND, Agent/VRU PGB cannot have remote CM to connect and requires a local CM node at SideB. Question is, if customer accepts the risk of not having CM redundancy and if hes ok that AgentP/VRU PGB contacts remote CM over WAN during failover, can we go ahead and propose the architecure i.e, Agent/VRU PGB exists at SideB without local CM node.
Only 25 agents are there for the whole solution as per customer and the call volume is much less.
Can I get the pros and cons of not having CM along with Agent PG at SideB. Is there any alternate for this design.
Any documentation or writeup explaining why AgentPG requires local CM node at the same location.
What is the impact if AgentPG does not have local CM node and contacts remote CM?
Thanks in advance