h-reap bad windows filesharing performance

Unanswered Question
Jun 27th, 2010
User Badges:

Hi,


I'm experiencing a very odd issue here. I'm running the following setup:


1x WLC 2106 running version 7.0.98.0.

2x 1131AG in local mode

1x 1131AG in h-reap mode with local switching.


Everything is working as it should except Windows File Sharing transfers on the h-reap AP. If a laptop is connected to the h-reap AP and it is transfering a file using WFS/SMB it performs really bad 0-400 KBps, it fluctuates up and down constrantly, but if I use FTP it works flawlessly (2,5 MBps constantly). I've tried two different sources, Win2k3 server with SMB + FTP and a Synology NAS with SMB + FTP. Every time I use SMB the performance is bad. When I connect the laptop using UTP it works like a charm. Even HTTP test 100MB.bin from the Internet is going with 2,5MBps constantly. I've tried several different laptops and OS's.


SMB works fine on the local mode AP's.



Laptop / SourceSMB on Local APSMB on H-Reap APHTTP on H-Reap APFTP on H-Reap AP
MacBook Pro/with Vista 2,5 MBps0 - 400 KBps2,5 MBps2,5 MBps
Dell Inspirion/with Windows 72,5 MBps0 - 400 KBps2,5 MBps2,5 MBps


Tried both the A and G frequencies, no difference.


Anyone any clues on why this might happen???


Thanks!

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
2044418Puts Sun, 06/27/2010 - 09:04
User Badges:

Just looking through the release notes and I found this open caveat:



CSCth02374

HREAP central switching TCP performance is better than local switching.


Is it possible that I face this bug with this issue?


When I look this bug up in the Bug Tool I see that this bug description is still only available to Cisco TAC. Is anyone able to look into this and post / verify this info?


Thanks!

2044418Puts Fri, 08/06/2010 - 10:54
User Badges:

Still facing this issue. Anyone with a possible solution?


Thanks!

2044418Puts Fri, 08/13/2010 - 10:22
User Badges:

Okay I just upgraded/downgraded from 7.0.98 to 6.0.199 and now it works fine. Seems to be a bug of version 7.0.98.0

Actions

This Discussion

Related Content