06-28-2010 10:55 PM - edited 03-04-2019 08:55 AM
Hi ALL:
I have a boradcast topology .In which R0 ,R1,R2 are on same subnet.
R0 and R2 are running OSPF. R1 and R2 are running RIP
Now, R0 advertises 1.1.1.1 through OSPF to R2 that R2 must redistribute in RIP.
As per my understanding R2 will not advertise those OSPF routes redistributed to R1 because of split horizon.
But in my case i am getting those routes on R1 through rip.
Am i missing something.
R2#show ip route 1.1.1.1
Routing entry for 1.1.1.1/32
Known via "ospf 10", distance 110, metric 11, type intra area
Redistributing via rip
Advertised by rip metric 1
Last update from 10.10.10.1 on FastEthernet0/0, 00:10:48 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.10.10.1, from 10.10.10.1, 00:10:48 ago, via FastEthernet0/0
Route metric is 11, traffic share count is 1
R2#show run | section rip
router rip
redistribute ospf 10 metric 1
network 10.0.0.0
no auto-summary
R1#show ip route 1.1.1.1
Routing entry for 1.0.0.0/8
Known via "rip", distance 120, metric 1
Redistributing via rip
Last update from 10.10.10.3 on FastEthernet0/0, 00:00:02 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 10.10.10.3, from 10.10.10.3, 00:00:02 ago, via FastEthernet0/0
Route metric is 1, traffic share count is 1
R1#show run | section rip
router rip
network 10.0.0.0
no auto-summary
Chao
Vishwa
06-29-2010 12:57 AM
Vishwa,
Split horizon is sure valid for RIP.
This rule is applicable for RIP learned routes only.
But in your case,
Is R2 learning the prefix 1.1.1.1/32 from R0 via RIP ?
If the answer is Yes, then your point is valid.
and
if its No, then the behaviour that you see is correct !
06-29-2010 02:48 AM
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: