Why naming is required in ASA

Unanswered Question
Sep 13th, 2010
User Badges:

Hi All,


Can anyone maybe explain to me the concept that--


Why naming is required in ASA like inside, outside, public, Private and dmz etc  ? 

Is it possible to configure asa without assign any name to its interface?


Regards,

Saurabh

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
Jennifer Halim Mon, 09/13/2010 - 19:03
User Badges:
  • Cisco Employee,

Yes, naming the interfaces are required for ASA as all translation, policy, failover, access-list configuration is assigned by name configured on each interface.

Kureli Sankar Mon, 09/13/2010 - 20:41
User Badges:
  • Cisco Employee,

Saurabh,

It is not possible to configure an interface without a name and security level.


It is like using numbers like room 1, room2, room3 instead of kitchen room, living room and bedroom in a house. It makes sense and easy to follow.


check this link on configuring interfaces: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa82/configuration/guide/intrface.html


-KS

Actions

This Discussion