cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
3390
Views
5
Helpful
1
Replies

Help configuring LACP on the 6509

gneslim
Level 1
Level 1

Hi,

I am currently setting up a LACP port-channel on the Cisco 6509 (SUP720-3BXL with the following modules:

NAME: "6", DESCR: "WS-X6348-RJ-45 48 port 10/100 mb RJ45 Rev. 6.1"
PID: WS-X6348-RJ-45    , VID:    , SN: XXXXXXXXXXX

NAME: "7", DESCR: "WS-X6548-RJ-45 SFM-capable 48-port 10/100 Mbps RJ45 Rev. 6.1"
PID: WS-X6548-RJ-45    , VID:    , SN: XXXXXXXXXXX

The config:

Building configuration...

Current configuration : 242 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet6/20
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 42,100,101
switchport mode trunk
no ip address
speed 100
duplex full
channel-protocol lacp
channel-group 20 mode passive
end

c6509_testlab#sh run int fa7/20
Building configuration...

Current configuration : 242 bytes
!
interface FastEthernet7/20
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 42,100,101
switchport mode trunk
no ip address
speed 100
duplex full
channel-protocol lacp
channel-group 20 mode passive
end

The switch immediately gives a error message:

2d02h: %EC-SP-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE_LACP: Fa7/20 is not compatible with aggregators in channel 20 and cannot attach to them (qos-disallowed card type combination: Fa7/20 and Fa6/20)
2d02h: %EC-SP-5-CANNOT_BUNDLE_LACP: Fa6/20 is not compatible with aggregators in channel 20 and cannot attach to them (qos-disallowed card type combination: Fa6/20 and Fa7/20)

However, the port-channel comes up but also spawns a secondary interface Port-channel20A.

What I'll like to know is, what does the error message (underlined in red) mean? And is there a way to get rid of the secondary port-channel?

If all it takes is for both cards to be the same model, that would be easy, but if it's configuration related, what should I look out for?

If more information is needed I'll be happy to provide. Thanks in advance.

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

Lei Tian
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi,

Add 'no mls qos channel-consistency' under port-channel; that will ignore the qos capability check across different module.


HTH,

Lei Tian

View solution in original post

1 Reply 1

Lei Tian
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

Hi,

Add 'no mls qos channel-consistency' under port-channel; that will ignore the qos capability check across different module.


HTH,

Lei Tian

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card