We have a configuration with 2 N7ks are a VPC pair and we are trying to migrate a SVI VLAN from a Cat 6500 to the N7ks. The SVI on the Cat 6500 has two secondary addresses and both times I shut down SVI on the 6500 and enable the SVI on the N7ks there were problems with hosts communicating with other hosts on the same vlan but different layer 3 subnets. Some revelant configurations below:
ip address 126.96.36.199/24
ip address 188.8.131.52/23 secondary
ip address 184.108.40.206/23 secondary
address 220.127.116.11 secondary
address 18.104.22.168 secondary
The basic physical topology is.
N7K-01 --- VPC ---- N7K-02
vrrp pri vrrp sec
L2 port-channel L2 port-channel
Currently all the layer 2 connectivity is either on the 6500 or a swicth connected to the 6500. My thought was if host 22.214.171.124 try to communicate 126.96.36.199, the packet went over N7K-02 physical link, then N7K-02 needed to send it to the default gateway, N7K-01 (vrrp prinary). From that point N7K-01 would drop the packet, because it would not be able to send the packet back to the 6500 over the port channel. I know the vpc peer gateway command should allow N7K-02 to respond, which we have configured, but does that command function the same with secondary addresses.