ā04-21-2012 03:51 AM - edited ā03-04-2019 04:06 PM
Hi,
Background - at the moment we have 64k links to branch sites with cisco routers at both ends (3600 central, 1841 remote). These low bandwidth links are very costly and not fast enough to run email/internet applications therefore we also have a seperate VPN network at each site where machines that need these applications are configured to use. (ASA 5500 central on a 10mb Fibre, ASA/PIX at remote sites on a DSL connection).
I am looking to tidy this up and consolidate into one reliable network. My question is, is there a router that can do the following:
I have looked at the Cisco 1921 router, would this be suitable?
Thanks in advance for any advice.
ā04-21-2012 06:48 AM
Look on the Cisco site for document Id 41940. If you are not running public ally addressable services at the remote sites, then a router is all you need, IMHO.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App
ā04-21-2012 07:16 AM
Thanks I'll take a look
We do have overnight CCTV monitoring at some sites so the router/firewall will need to be publicly accessible.
ā04-21-2012 11:50 AM
1- Get rid of ASA for VPN termination endpoint because they can not do GRE/IPSec or VTI.
2- you only need routers even if the routers have Internet facing. As long as you configure the routers properly, no need to worry about since these routers are used to terminate IPSec and nothing else.
3- With routers, you will be able to utilize multiple ISP connectivity for GRE/IPSec or DMVPN and do just about everything you want. Things that ASA can not provide. Not to mention QoS as well.
Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: