cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
4521
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

Port Channel issue on 6509

bmlabarr33
Level 1
Level 1

            I am setting up LACP links to a HP c7000 blade enclosure and am seeing something I have never seen before...  I configure two 10Gb interfaces to be members of "channel-group 10 mode active" and then configure the specific trunk info under the interface port channel.   When I connect the two links to the c7000's Flex10 module, the ports come up and port channel - this is where it gets weird...  When I do a "show etherchannel summary" on the 6500, I see the following: Notice the "A" that gets automatically create

10     Po10(SU)        LACP      Te3/7(P)      

10     Po10A(SU)       LACP      Te4/7(P) 

When the port channel is down, the "A" goes away and they show on the same line as members of Po10. 

They appear to be functioning properly when up, I've just never seen this behavior and am hoping someone can explain!

Thanks!

interface TenGigabitEthernet3/7

switchport

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport trunk native vlan 999

switchport trunk allowed vlan 58,61

switchport mode trunk

load-interval 30

channel-group 10 mode active

end

!

interface TenGigabitEthernet4/7

switchport

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport trunk native vlan 999

switchport trunk allowed vlan 58,61

switchport mode trunk

load-interval 30

channel-group 10 mode active

end

!

interface Port-channel10

switchport

switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q

switchport trunk native vlan 999

switchport trunk allowed vlan 58,61

switchport mode trunk

end

2 Replies 2

shijogeorge
Level 1
Level 1

This is seen when the channeled ports are not compatible with each other or with ports at remote peer.

May be due to mismatch at HP side config in your case.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094470.shtml#po1a

HTH

Shijo George

Giuseppe Larosa
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Hello Bmlabarr33,

it is a minor issue with no real impact on the portchannel behaviour I have sometimes seen the same.

This subject has been discussed in the forums. The explanation should be that there is at least a difference between the two member interfaces (including QoS aspects that may be defined at linecard or ASIC chip level) and for this reason IOS adds the second port as PO10A to mean a slight difference exist.

Hope to help

Giuseppe

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card