Warning message

  • Cisco Support Forums is in Read Only mode while the site is being migrated.
  • Cisco Support Forums is in Read Only mode while the site is being migrated.

Users Account on Cisco ISE

Unanswered Question
Feb 10th, 2014
User Badges:

Happy new week!

Hope your day is going on fine.

Is it possible to limit a internal (not guest) user credential for just a single active device session?

I know this is possible for guest account on ISE 1.2, but not sure for internal user.

If it is possible, then how do we get it done?

Thank you as I await your feedback.

Kind Regards,

Olusegun Dada


  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Ravi Singh Fri, 02/14/2014 - 10:23
User Badges:
  • Cisco Employee,

This is not possible with ISE but you can impliment it with WLC.

Saurav Lodh Thu, 03/06/2014 - 02:19
User Badges:
  • Gold, 750 points or more

I agree with Ravi , you can limit only guests however limiting internal users to certain number of concurrent sessions is in road map.

Venkatesh Attuluri Tue, 03/11/2014 - 07:02
User Badges:
  • Cisco Employee,

This can be done on WLC

if you are using device registration page then you can try Limiting the Number of Personal Devices Registered by Employees

 Choose Administration > Web Portal Management > Settings > My Devices > Portal Configuration.

 Enter the maximum number of devices that an employee can register in the Device Management field. By default, this value is set to 5 devices.

Naveen Kumar Tue, 03/11/2014 - 22:47
User Badges:
  • Silver, 250 points or more

I found that in the anchor controller you can limit the number of concurrent login per user. It's under the security and user login policy.

Tan Do Nhat Wed, 03/26/2014 - 20:31
User Badges:

I have this same problem too.

The customer requests that when a user has already had an existing session, he should not be able to authenticate with another session (no matter whether through another port, another switch, or another method ie. wired or wireless)

Anybody has any idea regarding this?


This Discussion