×

Warning message

  • Cisco Support Forums is in Read Only mode while the site is being migrated.
  • Cisco Support Forums is in Read Only mode while the site is being migrated.

OSM for GE vs. Non-OSM GE

Unanswered Question
Feb 14th, 2002
User Badges:

In a Cat65xx configuration for GE links, LAN and WAN, is the OSM module superior/required vs. the 6408GE card with appropriate GBICs? The OSM provides some configuration/administrative benefits, but will the 6408GE work as well, particularly on the WAN?


  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Overall Rating: 0 (0 ratings)
Loading.
ciscomoderator Wed, 02/27/2002 - 12:04
User Badges:
  • Gold, 750 points or more

Since there has been no response to your post, it appears to be either too complex or too rare an issue for other forum members to assist you, or there is no public information available at this time. If you don't get a suitable response to your post, you may wish to review our resources at the online http://www.cisco.com/go/solutions. You may also contact our product information line at 1-800-553-NETS or a Cisco Systems Engineer at your local Cisco office or reseller. To locate your local Cisco representative, visit http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/687/Directory.shtml


If anyone else in the forum has some advice, please reply to this thread.


Thank you for posting.


j-block Wed, 03/27/2002 - 09:00
User Badges:

Here are the differences between GE OSM, and regular NON-GE OSM (Catalyst):


GE WAN will do MPLS within the PXF complex, and this you only get 4 ports, and can only do linerate on 2 ports. You can shape in egress, and do DSS on these ports. These can be L3 only.


GE LAN ports are PXF enabled, and can not do MPLS. You can police on these ports in ingress, and you can run linerate across many more ports. The

prices are drastically different. These ports can be L2 or L3.

Actions

This Discussion