Ethernet vs. SDH/SONET

Unanswered Question
Jul 3rd, 2002

Can someone help me understand what are the benefits of using Ethernet switching in the MAN as opposed to SDH/SONET?

I have this problem too.
0 votes
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Average Rating: 4.5 (2 ratings)
xavierchang@hot... Wed, 07/03/2002 - 17:24

One word - money. Ethernet gear is cheaper to buy and cheaper to run.

So what's the problem? Reliability and availability. The installed base of traditional SONET is huge and SONET technology has been engineered for excellent reliability and fault-tolerance, albeit at a high cost. Ethernet is improving on reliability, but is still lagging. Ethernet is also gaining popularity but its presence in the metro/WAN is still miniscule.

ilya@itc-yar.ru Tue, 07/09/2002 - 22:32

Use that link: http://www.cisco.com/offer/tdm_home/infrastructure/man/ethernet.shtml

There are very useful article: "Understanding Ethernet in the Metropolian Area Networks".

Also I was writing another article (only in Russian language yet), where described some troubles for service providers, who implement they access networks on Ethernet technology:

1. Security risks of Spanning Tree.

2. VLAN Management.

3. Choice- Layer 2 or Layer 3 services for customers.

http://www.itc-yar.ru/doc/pub/Efm.pdf

wcarstairs Thu, 07/11/2002 - 07:20

Bear in mind that some Service Providers are also providing Ethernet services over their SDH networks. Just to confuse the matter further.

I think the only real benefit in that case is to the end user, ethernet interface on a switch or router is rather a lot cheaper than a POS interface on a router.

steve.roberts Thu, 07/11/2002 - 08:58

SONET is inherently channelized, into fixed rates of 1.5, 50, 155 Mbps, etc. SONET is layer one exclusively, switching implies a second layer. In Ethernet or ATM, the channels are virtual allowing oversubscription of a given shared pipe. When the customers traffic patterns are diverse, the packet switched systems can carry alot more customers in a given carriers network, compared to a pure SONET network. Manufacturers have combined the two, allowing shared channels of a SONET distribution network to carry ethernet traffic to multiple 10/100BaseT ports, confusing your equipment choices.

jsauviac Wed, 10/22/2003 - 03:01

I do agree with $$$ aspect as mentioned. If you consider the ML Series in the 15454, a Metro Ethernet solution is very viable. Part of the reason is that the ML has 12 10/100 port or 2 GE ports and allows traffic to be stat muxed around an RPR ring to offer metro services. The stat mux ability allows the customer the ability to get more bang for their buck vs. using a nailed up STS between locations that really only serves that one customer.

calvinie2001 Sun, 11/16/2003 - 18:08

hi,

GE ethernet is only a layer 2 consideration.

sonet is a physical layer 1 issue

I do think u mess it up

Jan_Ricker Tue, 11/25/2003 - 23:57

It is also an important point to use Etherchanneling over 100/1000 Mbps Ethernet links. This is useful for midrange fiber lines or point-to-point copper links between aggregation devices. This ability extends the useability of F-/G-Ethernet in MAN-environments.

Actions

Login or Register to take actions

This Discussion

Posted July 3, 2002 at 5:58 AM
Stats:
Replies:7 Avg. Rating:4.5
Views:1500 Votes:0
Shares:0
Tags: No tags.

Discussions Leaderboard