11-19-2002 08:10 AM - edited 03-02-2019 03:00 AM
I have one Cisco 4500 with 8 serial port and 6 Ethernet port. From the Ser0 and Ser1 I have two connectivity to my upstream provider. But one is of 2MB and other is of 1MB
See the configuration of 2 of LAN interfaces and ser0, and ser1 interfaces...
interface Ethernet0
description Local range 203.197.151.65-94
ip address 203.197.151.94 255.255.255.224
no ip directed-broadcast
media-type 10BaseT
no mop enabled
!
interface Ethernet1
description IP of Progs 202.4.191.1-126 mask .128
ip address 202.4.191.1 255.255.255.128
no ip directed-broadcast
media-type 10BaseT
!
interface Ethernet2
description Co-location range 202.4.191.129- .190 Mask .192
ip address 202.4.191.189 255.255.255.192
no ip directed-broadcast
media-type 10BaseT
!
interface Serial0
bandwidth 2048
ip address 203.197.150.230 255.255.255.252
no ip directed-broadcast
no ip mroute-cache
!
interface Serial1
bandwidth 1024
ip address 203.197.150.232 255.255.255.252
no ip directed-broadcast
!
Now my requirements are
1. Load balancing and fail over of all traffic from my network.
2. I want to route traffic from eth0 (203.197.151.64/27) through serial0(2mb), in case of any failure with 2MB link, I want the traffic through serial1
For the above two is this configuration is enough...
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial1 240
ip route 203.197.151.64 255.255.255.224 serial0(2mb)
ip route 203.197.151.64 255.255.255.224 serial1256k 240
3. I want to route traffic from eth1 through 1MB link, in case of any failure, I want this through 2mb link
So the configuration will be...
ip route 202.4.191.0 255.255.255.128 serial1
ip route 202.4.191.0 255.255.255.128 serial0 240
Is this correct...??
11-19-2002 08:38 AM
1. To achieve load balancing you need to have both the routes in the routing table at the same time.
2. with the configuration of default routes as you have done, the second default route wil not be available as long as 2 MB link is up and running. So if you need pure load balancing, you need to use same administrative distance for both the default routes.
The remaining ip rouite statements are of no use, because the ip addresses you have configured on the route statements are directly connected to your router.
If you need to route all traffic from e0 to s0 first and s1 (only when s0 fails), and all traffic from e1 to s1 first and s0 (only when s1 fails), you need to use policy routing.
int e0
ip policy route-map test1
int e1
ip policy route-map test1
route-map test1 permit 10
match interface ethernet0
set interface s0 s1
route-map test2 permit 20
match interface ethernet1
set interface s1 s0
Hope that helps!
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide