Ok ... thanks

I have a built a NAS with and the net 172.16.111.0/24 as a pool for dialin clients. To prevent 32 bit routes being put into the routing table, I have put a static ip route in the config on the NAS for this 24 bit net to null 0 and then redistributed this. I guess I wanted less interaction in the routing tables on the wan.

Thanks for advice.

I see, that your target was to prevent /32 routes from reaching other EIGRP routers. What you could really do is include 172.16.111.0 into EIGRP, put a passive interface on the virtual template interface or which ever interface which terminates the RAS connections from dialup clients, and then use a summarization to /24 mask on the ethernet interface, (or which ever interface)which connects to other eigrp routers. Using summarization (ip summary-address) command will cause the IOS to automatically put a same summary route on its routing table, pointing to null 0. This way you can avoid redistribution commands.

Hi

I think that sounds great .... thanks .... I had toyed with the idea but not quite worked it all out.

Thanks again

Hi

Just one Q which I forgot .... I am going to passive int the virtual template that the TA users dial in too, do I need to do the same for the int group-async 1 ... the users dialling via modems, I think it would be correct too but could you advise.

Many thanks

There is no harm adding two passive interface, one for each...

thanks